[SYCL][E2E] Fix LIT feature name

[uditagarwal97]

This test always gets skipped due to incorrect LIT feature name.

[bader]

I suggest removing -/_ from the lit feature name to avoid similar bugs in the future. It won't prevent other typos, but this specific one is just ridiculous.

[uditagarwal97]

We have a lot of LIT features with - or _ in their name, renaming all of them would be a big change. How about we instead make LIT throw an error if it encounters an unknown LIT feature?
IIRC we already maintain a list of approved LIT features to decide if it's build-time or runtime feature.

[KornevNikita]

We have a lot of LIT features with - or _ in their name, renaming all of them would be a big change. How about we instead make LIT throw an error if it encounters an unknown LIT feature? IIRC we already maintain a list of approved LIT features to decide if it's build-time or runtime feature.

That's a good idea, I believe we have more typos. I tried to implement it previously, but it got bogged down in discussion.

[uditagarwal97]

@KornevNikita I like the solution you proposed in #16019 - it's easy to maintain, extend, and require minimal changes. Let me try it out

[uditagarwal97]

@intel/unified-runtime-reviewers-level-zero ping