[antonwolfy]

main fails tests/test_growth_ratchet.py again: #153 took dokimi/repos/compare.py::_provenance_warnings to complexity 11, over the 10 cap, after #184 reseeded the baseline. Every open PR's Tests job goes red with it, since pull_request CI tests each PR merged into main.

This PR was opened before #184 and did the same reseed. Rebased onto main, it now does two things, both in scripts/growth_baseline.json only:

Entry	Change
dokimi/repos/compare.py::_provenance_warnings	new, complexity 11, grown by #153
dokimi/llm.py (lines)	rationale names #180
dokimi/eval/judge.py::Judge._judge_answer	rationale names #180
dokimi/eval/panel.py::JudgePanel._call_judge	rationale names #180
dokimi/commands/repo_run.py::_context	rationale names #120
dokimi/repos/manifest.py::_check_task	rationale names #113 and #120

#184 gave those five the generic "grew on main after the #93 seed" rationale; naming the PR tells whoever splits them where to look. No numbers change except the new entry.

Checked locally on main + this commit: python scripts/check_growth.py exits 0, pytest tests/test_growth_ratchet.py passes (45 passed, 1 skipped). No changelog fragment needed, since only scripts/ changes.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[codecov-commenter]

⚠️ Please install the to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.67%. Comparing base (8782e1c) to head (95e1c37).
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #183   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.67%   91.67%           
=======================================
  Files         223      223           
  Lines       27505    27505           
  Branches     4525     4525           
=======================================
  Hits        25216    25216           
  Misses       1620     1620           
  Partials      669      669           

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[vchamarthi]

@exai-bot /review

[exai-bot]

Note

AI-generated review of 18041013941f, requested by @vchamarthi, using the default review skill. It can be wrong: verify a finding before acting on it. React with a thumbs up or down on a finding to tell the bot whether it helped.
Model us.anthropic.claude-sonnet-5-5, effort default, 4 of 80 turns, 0.2 of 40 minutes, 73k in / 1k out tokens.

This PR reseeds scripts/growth_baseline.json for the growth that landed on main after #93. It raises four entries, adds repo_run.py::_context, and drops the novelty/bundle.py entry. I found no defects. Every raised or added entry has a hand-written rationale, well under the 300-character limit. The rationales differ from the old text, so raised_without_rationale should accept them. The new entry sits in sorted position, matching dump_baseline's ordering. The Tests jobs on py3.11–3.14, which include test_growth_ratchet, are green on the head. The change is limited to the baseline file.

No issues found.

Not verified

I did not recompute the line counts and complexities against the code. I relied on the green Tests jobs, which run test_growth_ratchet, and on the PR's statement that check_growth.py exits 0. I did not check the rationale claims about #120 and #180, such as which PR grew which function.