Update code of conduct to require ai notices on communication - #9453
Conversation
|
It seems pretty innocuous, but because it's a change to the code of conduct I'd like sign-off from some more people. I think as a general policy it should require broad consensus to change the code of conduct. I'll tag it dev-meeting. |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #9453 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 70.12% 70.10% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 261 261
Lines 79818 79818
Branches 19445 19445
==========================================
- Hits 55972 55957 -15
+ Misses 17991 17973 -18
- Partials 5855 5888 +33 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
I don't really think we need many opinions here. We humans are telling robots how to behave and that's fine. |
I agree. Not much to discuss. I'll tag @derek-gerstmann and @slomp in case they have any objections. |
|
No objections. |
|
Yes, I didn't imagine this change would be controversial, I just don't like the idea that one person and one approver can change the code of conduct without others having the chance to weigh in. |
|
No controversy for me ... I approve. |
|
I think that's enough sign-off. I'll merge it. |
Claude posted a comment as me autonomously with no indication that it was bot-generated. I don't like this at all. This PR changes the code of conduct and CLAUDE.md in an effort to get it to not do this in future. You should know whether you're talking to me or an agent acting under my username.