You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[api design] Encoding values for LOAD DATA LOCAL INFILE #1416
Hi. I'm working on a feature for sqlc to do a bulk insert. sqlc generates a struct with the columns of the table, and I want to do a bulk insert of those.
Expose a Config(v any) function that takes the value from https://pkg.go.dev/database/sql#Conn.Raw (same as the previous, but as a function that takes an argument rather than a method's receiver)
RegisterStructsHandler that is responsible for converting structs to TSV and can be used instead of RegisterReaderHandler.
Pass the Config to the callback of RegisterReaderHandler (in a backwards compatible way)
Most simple and quick way is just user pass the location to sqlc.
User knows dsn or mysql.Config so that user knows the correct loc.
For future, my idea is:
// in mysql drivertypeMySQLConninterface {
private() // Other module can not implement this interface. We can add more APIs in the future.Location() *time.Location// Get Config.Location of this connection. (This may differ from `time_zone` connection variable.)LoadFromReader(r*io.Reader) error// Use this instead of RegisterReaderHandler.
}
// in user code.varf io.Reader// some data.err:=conn.Raw(func (dcany) error {
mc:=dc.(MySQLConn)
returnmc.LoadFromReader(f)
})
I feel that would be a burden on the user. It requires them to plumb through the connection settings to every place that needs it.
I like that interface. (Though I'm not entirely sure how LoadFromReader would work. Would that run a LOAD DATA INFILE query itself?) (And it wouldn't be perfect for sqlc, because it would require implementing the Raw method for any middleware.
How do you feel about #1419? That'd allow me to encode correctly.
Config.Clone() is bit heavy. Why need to clone all config only for a *Location?
I don't mind changing that. With public libraries I tend to try to make them user-proof and make sure they can't break things by changing an internal value.
Config contains password. Why need to add surface to leak password only for a *Location?
Fair enough.
Many users (including me) just use only UTC. No need to pass location around.
Me too, sadly sqlc can't assume all users do that.
Some users using Location just need to pass it to bulk insert. It is not big burden.
If it is burden, user can store it in Context.
I'd totally do that in my own project, but it will break sqlc users that switch from simple INSERT INTOs to a LOAD DATA INFILE and suddenly correctly encoding time.Time's depends on a context variable.
I've updated #1419 with a new proposal, to only pass a struct with the *Location. (A struct so we can later extend it without breaking compatibility.) What do you think?
Alternatively, what do you think of adding an API that handles all the TSV encoding? That API would be really useful for other go-sql-driver/mysql users.
I've updated #1419 with a new proposal, to only pass a struct with the *Location. (A struct so we can later extend it without breaking compatibility.) What do you think?
I still hate it. It increase public APIs only for your use case.
Alternatively, what do you think of adding an API that handles all the TSV encoding? That API would be really useful for other go-sql-driver/mysql users.
API compatible to pg or pgx is better than registry.
Activity
methane commentedon Apr 23, 2023
Most simple and quick way is just user pass the location to sqlc.
User knows dsn or mysql.Config so that user knows the correct loc.
For future, my idea is:
Introduce RegisterReaderHandlerWithConfig
Introduce RegisterReaderHandlerWithConfig
Introduce RegisterReaderHandlerWithConfig
Jille commentedon Apr 25, 2023
I feel that would be a burden on the user. It requires them to plumb through the connection settings to every place that needs it.
I like that interface. (Though I'm not entirely sure how LoadFromReader would work. Would that run a LOAD DATA INFILE query itself?) (And it wouldn't be perfect for sqlc, because it would require implementing the
Rawmethod for any middleware.How do you feel about #1419? That'd allow me to encode correctly.
methane commentedon Apr 25, 2023
I find my old idea:
#1060 (comment)
methane commentedon Apr 25, 2023
My old idea doesn't require new interface.
Jille commentedon Apr 25, 2023
While I like the idea of avoiding a register+unregister and passing the data to the call, it does have a few downsides:
Rawmethod (and adding it would be a problem for middleware).methane commentedon Apr 26, 2023
I feel it is far better than #1419. #1419 add ugly API only for getting Config.Loc.
Config.Clone() is bit heavy. Why need to clone all config only for a
*Location?Config contains password. Why need to add surface to leak password only for a
*Location?Many users (including me) just use only UTC. No need to pass location around.
Some users using Location just need to pass it to bulk insert. It is not big burden.
Introduce RegisterReaderHandlerWithEncoderInfo
Jille commentedon Apr 26, 2023
I don't mind changing that. With public libraries I tend to try to make them user-proof and make sure they can't break things by changing an internal value.
Fair enough.
Me too, sadly sqlc can't assume all users do that.
I'd totally do that in my own project, but it will break sqlc users that switch from simple INSERT INTOs to a LOAD DATA INFILE and suddenly correctly encoding time.Time's depends on a context variable.
I've updated #1419 with a new proposal, to only pass a struct with the *Location. (A struct so we can later extend it without breaking compatibility.) What do you think?
Alternatively, what do you think of adding an API that handles all the TSV encoding? That API would be really useful for other go-sql-driver/mysql users.
methane commentedon Apr 26, 2023
I still hate it. It increase public APIs only for your use case.
API compatible to pg or pgx is better than registry.
Jille commentedon Apr 26, 2023
Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean with your last sentence. (Particularly, what do you mean with "registry"?)
methane commentedon Apr 26, 2023
I meant
RegisterXxx()APIs. I don't like them and avoid adding more such APIs.Expose a MySQLConn interface for use with database/sql.Conn.Raw()
Expose a MySQLConn interface for use with database/sql.Conn.Raw()
Jille commentedon Jun 26, 2023
Ok, I've thought of a way to make your proposed API work with sqlc, so I've sent a PR for that: #1454
Expose a MySQLConn interface for use with database/sql.Conn.Raw()