Repository navigation
fix(workflows): Clean invalid condition comparisons - #124230
sentry-junior[bot] wants to merge 5 commits into
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Kyle Consalus <kyle.consalus@sentry.io>
|
This PR has a migration; here is the generated SQL for for --
-- Raw Python operation
--
-- THIS OPERATION CANNOT BE WRITTEN AS SQL |
|
revisit this, and consider the migration(s) that have already gone through recently. |
|
This PR has a migration; here is the generated SQL for for --
-- Raw Python operation
--
-- THIS OPERATION CANNOT BE WRITTEN AS SQL |
|
rebase please. |
…atacondition-comparisons # Conflicts: # migrations_lockfile.txt Co-Authored-By: Kyle Consalus <kyle.consalus@sentry.io>
|
This PR has a migration; here is the generated SQL for for --
-- Raw Python operation
--
-- THIS OPERATION CANNOT BE WRITTEN AS SQL |
|
This issue has gone three weeks without activity. In another week, I will close it. But! If you comment or otherwise update it, I will reset the clock, and if you remove the label "A weed is but an unloved flower." ― Ella Wheeler Wilcox 🥀 |
Adds a post-deployment data migration for the remaining schema-invalid
DataCondition.comparisonvalues tracked by ISWF-3455.It normalizes only unambiguous integer, resolution, detector, and numeric priority values. Values that cannot be converted safely are logged and left unchanged. Existing named-priority cleanup from ISWF-3433 is not repeated.
This migration now follows
0120_replace_boolean_deescalation_comparisons, which already handles stored boolean de-escalation values, so this PR no longer duplicates that cleanup.via Junior system actor
event.--
View Junior Session [Sentry]