You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We are long time users of Sentry, but not supporting solid_queue is a blocker to us. New projects are using solid_queue and won't be able to use Sentry.
Reacted by Neel Shah, Pavel Kalashnikov, Rodrigo Coutinho and Arnold Roa
hey folks, just a quick update that we've started working on a bigger effort to consolidate and improve support for background job backends via ActiveJob-first approach. It will come with support for SolidQueue OOTB.
Reacted by Tyson Gach, Pavel Kalashnikov, Fernando Shayani, Matthew Puku, Matthieu Rigal and Arnold Roa
Activity
naoto-k commentedon May 2, 2025
Thanks for the drafting, we are considering migrating from sidekiq to solid queue. Any progress on this Issue?
nflorentin commentedon Oct 23, 2025
We are long time users of Sentry, but not supporting solid_queue is a blocker to us. New projects are using solid_queue and won't be able to use Sentry.
3 remaining items
lakim commentedon Dec 9, 2025
We're also needing Solid Queue support and we'll unfortunately need to look for alternatives that better support the default Rails stack.
kalashnikovisme commentedon Jan 20, 2026
Any updates here?
antoinefink commentedon Mar 20, 2026
We've ended up building this integration ourselves. We use it concurrently we've the sidekiq one: https://github.com/hunter-io/sentry-ruby/tree/feat/sentry-solid-queue/sentry-solid_queue
Maybe that can help :)
solnic commentedon Apr 27, 2026
hey folks, just a quick update that we've started working on a bigger effort to consolidate and improve support for background job backends via ActiveJob-first approach. It will come with support for SolidQueue OOTB.