Repository navigation
build(deps): Bump pydantic from 2.13.4 to 2.14.1 in /servers/engine - #1818
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Bumps [pydantic](https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic) from 2.13.4 to 2.14.1. - [Release notes](https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic/blob/main/HISTORY.md) - [Commits](pydantic/pydantic@v2.13.4...v2.14.1) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: pydantic dependency-version: 2.14.1 dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-minor ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
dependabot
Bot
added
dependencies
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
|
Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.
|
![evaos-code-review-bot[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/4184532?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Walkthrough
PR: #1818 - build(deps): Bump pydantic from 2.13.4 to 2.14.1 in /servers/engine
Head: b01ce1a4362cf1e4b73818f2466185b3a00c8758 into main. Review event: COMMENT.
Estimated review effort: 1/5 (~10 min)
Changed Files
| File | Status | Churn | Purpose | Risk |
|---|
Review Signal
No validated inline findings.
Dropped findings before posting: 0. High-severity findings: 0.
Maintainer Analysis
Changed behavior:
- The PR title describes a Pydantic dependency bump from 2.13.4 to 2.14.1 under servers/engine, but no file list or diff content was provided.
Affected invariants:
- Engine dependency resolution, API compatibility, serialization, and validation behavior should remain stable.
Evidence:
- The supplied Files and Diff sections are empty.
Limitations:
- No changed right-side lines were available to inspect or cite.
- Per the review constraints, no shell commands, tests, builds, package scripts, or arbitrary PR code were executed.
No-finding rationale: No finding could be validated against a current right-side diff line because the provided diff is empty; speculative dependency-risk findings were omitted.
Risk Taxonomy
No finding categories.
Validation and Proof
1 required validation/proof recommendation(s) selected from changed files.
- required: Unity editor or Play Mode smoke - WorldOS repo profile implies Unity runtime risk. Proof: Unity editor smoke; Play Mode log; scene/prefab screenshot or recording.
Proof status: missing - 1 required validation/proof recommendation(s) missing from PR metadata.
Related Context
Related issues/PRs: #13955, #13956, #13954, #13964, #13967, #13972, #13973, #13978.
Pre-merge checklist
- Inline comments target current RIGHT-side diff lines.
- No secret-like content survived into posted inline comments.
- REQUEST_CHANGES is only used when eligible P0/P1 findings survive validation.
- Required behavior proof is present or not applicable.
|
Important Review skippedBot user detected. To trigger a single review, invoke the ⚙️ Run configuration
You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
Warning Billing warning: we have not been able to collect payment for this subscription for more than 72 hours. Please update the payment method or pay any pending invoices in Billing to avoid service interruption. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Superseded by #1825. |
Bumps pydantic from 2.13.4 to 2.14.1.
Release notes
Sourced from pydantic's releases.
... (truncated)
Changelog
Sourced from pydantic's changelog.
... (truncated)
Commits
b2212c7Prepare release v2.14.1968fb2bFix docs conversion table6adc8b3Support named tuples inSequencevalidation7637fbcReject out-of-range int inputs fortimedeltadfdbfcbEnforce themax_digitswhole-digits limit in the PythonDecimalvalidatore2456d3Supportclosedandextra_itemsvia inheritance inTypedDict317655dHarden CI security3ba1dd4FixTypeErroronForwardRefon Python 3.10.043681abBumpsamuelcolvin/check-python-versionaction to v5.1d6bc53aAvoid unnecessary extra dict allocation in model validationDependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
@dependabot rebase.Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
@dependabot rebasewill rebase this PR@dependabot recreatewill recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditionswill show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency@dependabot ignore this major versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this minor versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this dependencywill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)