adopt verification report - #330
Conversation
License Check Results🚀 The license check job ran with the Bazel command: bazel run --lockfile_mode=error //:license-checkStatus: Click to expand output |
|
The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html |
* verify version in MODULE.bazel * add dry_run support to release workflow * fix: double-zip in upload-artifact by uploading directory * update actions/checkout to v7 and setup-bazel to 0.19 (Node 24) * add job summary and annotations to release verification * version-stamp zip and artifact names with release version * mark dry-run artifacts with _dry-run suffix * fix: coverage n/a by capturing genhtml stdout into env vars * fix: Rust coverage via ferrocene-coverage, fix coverage regex for //:rust_coverage output * ci: tee job summary to stdout for CLI retrieval
* drop MODULE version and simplify release workflow * sync MODULE.bazel.lock after module change
* cicd: fix qnx buid workflow * cicd: use hash in copyright workflow and removed merge_group trigger
* ci: update bzlmod lock workflow to v0.0.2 and PR-only Switch the reusable workflow reference from v0.0.0 to v0.0.2 and drop redundant working-directory input. Limit triggers to pull_request events since main is PR-protected and merge queue is not enabled, reducing unnecessary CI runs. * ci: pin bzlmod lock workflow to v0.0.2 commit hash Use the immutable commit SHA for bzlmod-lock-check and keep the concise #v0.0.2 tag annotation for readability.
actions/checkout v4.4.0 backported the pull_request_target fork-checkout block, breaking cit-tests (no tests-report -> build-docs fails). Pin to the pre-block v4.2.2, matching the rest of the org. Refs #349
- update to avoid extra generated branches by compiler. - follow up see eclipse-score/cicd-workflows#139
* chore(deps): update dependency score_platform to v0.6.3 * add version 1 to comp_arc_sta and comp_arc_dyn elements in kvs arch --------- Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
PandaeDo
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@FScholPer I appreciate the work so far. But I also think that we have to rework the report. For me it's unreadable. It would be great to have a overview and not so many details. The details should be available. But as a consumer of the informations you have to scroll to the complete document to find what you need. As we discussed this is also a POC. Fine for me for the moment. But if possible to spend some more time on improvement as described I would think that this report will find much more acceptance.
aschemmel-tech
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
see inline comments
| - For external component Assumptions of Use: coverage by platform safety manual or feature/components incl. test case, passed/failed and completeness verdict | ||
| - This is split in a list of QM requirements tested and a separate list of tests for ASIL rated requirements. | ||
| - List of component requirements (ASIL rated) linked to inspection checklist and verdict (derived from PR export) | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Here it would be good to have overview pie charts like:
- req/aou inspected/valid/invalid
- req without testcases/with testcases linked
- req tested passed/skipped/failed
| **7. Test logs** | ||
| - Test log per test case with status passed/failed/not_run | ||
|
|
||
| .. needtable:: Test Logs Per Testcase |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
it is not clear for me what this table shows
links in the "need ID" do not work for me
Frank Scholter Peres frank.scholter_peres@mercedes-benz.com, Mercedes-Benz Tech Innovation GmbH
Provider Information