Rename mock_control_(client|daemon) to control_client_test_driver - #472
Merged
MaciejKaszynski merged 2 commits intoAug 14, 2026
Merged
Conversation
cameron-craig-etas
requested a deployment
to
workflow-approval
August 14, 2026 07:04 — with
GitHub Actions
Waiting
cameron-craig-etas
requested a deployment
to
workflow-approval
August 14, 2026 07:04 — with
GitHub Actions
Waiting
License Check Results🚀 The license check job ran with the Bazel command: bazel run --lockfile_mode=error //:license-checkStatus: Click to expand output |
cameron-craig-etas
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 14, 2026 07:09
cameron-craig-etas
requested review from
FScholPer,
MaciejKaszynski,
NicolasFussberger,
anmittag,
antonkri,
pawelrutkaq and
ramceb
as code owners
August 14, 2026 07:09
|
The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html |
MaciejKaszynski
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In tests/integration/process_fd_leak we have a control_client.cpp I think it would also need to be renamed to control_client_test_driver. Do you think this should be done on this PR or if it's easier we can do on the precommit pr #464
Member
IMO it would make more sense here. |
cameron-craig-etas
requested a deployment
to
workflow-approval
August 14, 2026 09:13 — with
GitHub Actions
Waiting
cameron-craig-etas
requested a deployment
to
workflow-approval
August 14, 2026 09:13 — with
GitHub Actions
Waiting
cameron-craig-etas
force-pushed
the
stubs-arent-mocks
branch
from
August 14, 2026 09:21
5bed903 to
3db62be
Compare
cameron-craig-etas
requested a deployment
to
workflow-approval
August 14, 2026 09:21 — with
GitHub Actions
Waiting
cameron-craig-etas
requested a deployment
to
workflow-approval
August 14, 2026 09:21 — with
GitHub Actions
Waiting
cameron-craig-etas
force-pushed
the
stubs-arent-mocks
branch
from
August 14, 2026 09:39
3db62be to
c1a946d
Compare
cameron-craig-etas
requested a deployment
to
workflow-approval
August 14, 2026 09:39 — with
GitHub Actions
Waiting
cameron-craig-etas
requested a deployment
to
workflow-approval
August 14, 2026 09:39 — with
GitHub Actions
Waiting
MaciejKaszynski
approved these changes
Aug 14, 2026
cameron-craig-etas
force-pushed
the
stubs-arent-mocks
branch
from
August 14, 2026 10:04
c1a946d to
f36efb3
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#458
This PR renames the test drivers in our integration tests to better reflect what they are doing. They used to be called mocks, but they were not in fact mocks. We thought they might be stubs, but we have found that they are best described as test drivers, as they are primarily driving the test by changing run targets.