Skip to content

Dependency Updates - #631

Merged
akurtakov merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
update_target
Sep 27, 2026
Merged

akurtakov merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
update_target

Conversation

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The content of the target linuxtools-latest.target was updated

Please review the changes and merge if appropriate, or cherry pick individual updates.

The content of the location https://download.eclipse.org/tools/orbit/simrel/orbit-aggregation/milestone/latest was updated:

  • Unit com.github.jnr.jffi.native was updated from 1.4.0.v20260626-1000 to 1.4.3.v20260916-1000

@akurtakov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/request-license-review

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

/request-license-review

License review requests:

After all reviews have concluded, re-run the license-vetting check from the Github Actions web-interface to update its status.

Workflow run (with attached summary files):
https://github.com/eclipse-linuxtools/org.eclipse.linuxtools/actions/runs/36297457577

@akurtakov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

As this is Orbit content merging to unbreak the build.

@akurtakov
akurtakov merged commit 5719334 into master Sep 27, 2026
2 of 3 checks passed
@merks

merks commented Sep 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@akurtakov

I wonder if any thought has been given to expressing the Orbit units using a version range such that they don't need updating for minor version updates?

@akurtakov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Not really :).

@akurtakov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

After giving it some thought it would actually make master licensecheck verification break unnoticed so until the "duplicate" problem is fixed in dash-licensetool is fixed it's better to be exact to so I can "request" these reviews.

@merks

merks commented Sep 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I didn't see a comment from Wayne, but I think that is not happening anymore, or it would have happened here.

Of course Orbit does the requests but it is possible that a milestone is produced with a review that's not completed, e.g., h2 for the latest milestone. In that case, the Linux build will remain broken until that review is completed. But maybe that's the goal.

In any case, given the update is automated, and given the update might actually replace a range with an actual version, it's likely not worth the effort...

(I only noticed because the generated reports show me when a target file is modified by the project.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants