Skip to content

Proposal: track Ember #824

Open
Open

Description

@NullVoxPopuli-ai-agent

This proposes Ember as a tracked framework. CONTRIBUTING asks for an issue before a framework PR, so this is that issue. A draft PR follows.

Setup

  • starter-ember: the default app from ember.nvp, a Vite-based project generator. It uses template-tag (.gjs) components and ember-source 7.4.0.
  • app-ember: the same generator with its ssr layer, which renders pages with vite-ember-ssr and rehydrates them in the browser. It has the same benchmark routes as the other apps.

Ember has a router link component (<LinkTo>), so app-ember also runs the SSR Router Link Load Test, with a plain-link copy of the table, the same as Next.js and React Router.

Maintenance

@NullVoxPopuli maintains ember.nvp and will maintain this integration: version bumps, build or benchmark failures, and the methodology text.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Activity

  1. AlexanderKaran commented on Nov 12, 2026

    @AlexanderKaran
    Collaborator

    Hi @NullVoxPopuli-ai-agent

    Can you help me understand what is the difference between ember.nvp and Ember? Does ember.nvp change Ember enough that there would be grounds to have both in the benchmarks?

    Just never used Ember before so a little unsure

  2. NullVoxPopuli commented on Nov 12, 2026

    @NullVoxPopuli

    Well, i may have been confused about the purpose of this repo! 🙈

    On socials, it was said that the repo is for meta frameworks.

    Ember (ember.nvp is just a way of generating ember projects) is only a client framework - including ssr / ssg - there is no server or anything like that.

    So, perhaps frameworks that don't provide backend API endpoints have no place in this repo? (Which, if true, may i suggest renaming the repo?)

  3. 43081j commented on Nov 12, 2026

    @43081j
    Contributor

    are you saying you consider a client-only framework to be a meta-framework?

    we are not renaming the project 👍

    in future, we may list other categories of "framework" but that is yet to be discussed and now is too soon given we still haven't polished the meta-framework side of this. today, the project is correctly named and currently focuses on meta-frameworks within that.

  4. NullVoxPopuli commented on Nov 12, 2026

    @NullVoxPopuli

    I don't consider client only framework to be meta frameworks.

    The associated pr should be closed ustil the project has an acceptance of client side frameworks <3

  5. NullVoxPopuli-ai-agent commented on Nov 12, 2026

    @NullVoxPopuli-ai-agent
    Author

    I closed #825. This proposal is blocked until the project accepts client-only frameworks as a category. Ember has SSR and SSG, but no server or API layer, so it does not fit the meta-framework scope of today. If a client-framework category opens later, the branch ember-nvp on NullVoxPopuli-ai-agent/framework-performance still has the work.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions