Skip to content

Update dependency pycryptodomex to v3.19.1 [SECURITY]#35

Closed
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
renovate/pypi-pycryptodomex-vulnerability
Closed

Update dependency pycryptodomex to v3.19.1 [SECURITY]#35
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
renovate/pypi-pycryptodomex-vulnerability

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@renovate renovate Bot commented Jan 6, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
pycryptodomex (source, changelog) ==3.18.0 -> ==3.19.1 age adoption passing confidence

GitHub Vulnerability Alerts

CVE-2023-52323

PyCryptodome and pycryptodomex before 3.19.1 allow side-channel leakage for OAEP decryption, exploitable for a Manger attack.


Release Notes

Legrandin/pycryptodome (pycryptodomex)

v3.19.1: - Zeil

Compare Source

Resolved issues

  • Fixed a side-channel leakage with OAEP decryption that could be
    exploited to carry out a Manger attack. Thanks to Hubert Kario.

v3.19.0: - Ulm

Compare Source

New features

  • The update() methods of TupleHash128 and TupleHash256 objects
    can now hash multiple items (byte strings) at once.
    Thanks to Sylvain Pelissier.
  • Added support for ECDH, with Crypto.Protocol.DH.

Resolved issues

  • GH#754: due to a bug in cffi, do not use it on Windows with Python 3.12+.

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@KaKi87 KaKi87 closed this Jun 4, 2025
@KaKi87 KaKi87 deleted the renovate/pypi-pycryptodomex-vulnerability branch June 4, 2025 20:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant