Conversation
dsherret
commented
Sep 7, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds two outputs so a workflow can act on the result without parsing the log:
unformatted-count: the number of files that aren't formattedunformatted-files: the files that aren't formatted, one per line, relative to the workspaceThe check step now always runs
dprint check --jsonwhennodeis available and the script records the outputs. Theannotationsinput only controls whether the::errorlines are emitted, so the outputs are available with annotations disabled too. The outputs are empty on dprint before 0.57 or withoutnode, like annotations.The cache job in CI asserts the outputs for both the failing check (
1andpoorly-formatted.json) and the passing one (0and empty).