Skip to content
Draft
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
9 changes: 9 additions & 0 deletions standard/conversions.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
> ```csharp
> enum Color { Red, Blue, Green }
>
> // The expression 0 converts implicitly to enum types

Check warning on line 28 in standard/conversions.md

View workflow job for this annotation

GitHub Actions / Markdown to Word Converter

standard/conversions.md#L28

MDC032::Line length 82 > maximum 81
> Color c0 = 0;
>
> // Other int expressions need explicit conversion
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -390,6 +390,15 @@

There is an implicit conversion from a *switch_expression* ([§12.11](expressions.md#1211-switch-expression)) to every type `T` for which there exists an implicit conversion from each *switch_expression_arm*’s *switch_expression_arm_expression*’s to `T`.

### §imp-cond-expr-conv Implicit conditional expression conversions

For a *conditional_expression* `c ? e1 : e2`, when

1. there is no common type for `e1` and `e2`, or
1. for which a common type exists, but one of the expressions `e1` or `e2` has no implicit conversion to that type

an implicit ***conditional expression conversion*** exists that permits an implicit conversion from *conditional_expression* to any type `T` for which there is a conversion-from-expression from `e1` to `T` and also from `e2` to `T`. It is an error if *conditional_expression* neither has a common type between `e1` and `e2` nor is subject to a conditional expression conversion.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So this makes available a conversion to a specific type... and I'm assuming we expect the rules to just drop out for which types are "tested" for this? For example, if I have

void M(int x) { ... }
void M(string y) { ... }

... then overload resolution of M(true ? new(new char[0]) : new(new char[1])) would detect that there's an implicit conversion from both of those target-typed new expressions to string, but not to int?


## 10.3 Explicit conversions

### 10.3.1 General
Expand Down
9 changes: 5 additions & 4 deletions standard/expressions.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,15 +1,15 @@
# 12 Expressions

Check warning on line 1 in standard/expressions.md

View workflow job for this annotation

GitHub Actions / Markdown to Word Converter

standard/expressions.md#L1

MDC032::Line length 83 > maximum 81

Check warning on line 2 in standard/expressions.md

View workflow job for this annotation

GitHub Actions / Markdown to Word Converter

standard/expressions.md#L2

MDC032::Line length 84 > maximum 81
## 12.1 General

Check warning on line 3 in standard/expressions.md

View workflow job for this annotation

GitHub Actions / Markdown to Word Converter

standard/expressions.md#L3

MDC032::Line length 85 > maximum 81

Check warning on line 3 in standard/expressions.md

View workflow job for this annotation

GitHub Actions / Markdown to Word Converter

standard/expressions.md#L3

MDC032::Line length 86 > maximum 81

An expression is a sequence of operators and operands. This clause defines the syntax, order of evaluation of operands and operators, and meaning of expressions.

Check warning on line 5 in standard/expressions.md

View workflow job for this annotation

GitHub Actions / Markdown to Word Converter

standard/expressions.md#L5

MDC032::Line length 82 > maximum 81

Check warning on line 6 in standard/expressions.md

View workflow job for this annotation

GitHub Actions / Markdown to Word Converter

standard/expressions.md#L6

MDC032::Line length 82 > maximum 81

Check warning on line 6 in standard/expressions.md

View workflow job for this annotation

GitHub Actions / Markdown to Word Converter

standard/expressions.md#L6

MDC032::Line length 82 > maximum 81
## 12.2 Expression classifications

### 12.2.1 General

The result of an expression is classified as one of the following:

Check warning on line 12 in standard/expressions.md

View workflow job for this annotation

GitHub Actions / Markdown to Word Converter

standard/expressions.md#L12

MDC032::Line length 82 > maximum 81
- A value. Every value has an associated type.
- A variable. Unless otherwise specified, a variable is explicitly typed and has an associated type, namely the declared type of the variable. An implicitly typed variable has no associated type.
- A null literal. An expression with this classification can be implicitly converted to a reference type or nullable value type.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1114,10 +1114,11 @@

#### 12.6.4.5 Better conversion from expression

Given an implicit conversion `C₁` that converts from an expression `E` to a type `T₁`, and an implicit conversion `C₂` that converts from an expression `E` to a type `T₂`, `C₁` is a ***better conversion*** than `C₂` if one of the following holds:
Given an implicit conversion `C₁` that converts from an expression `E` to a type `T₁`, and an implicit conversion `C₂` that converts from an expression `E` to a type `T₂`, `C₁` is a ***better conversion*** than `C₂` if `E` does not exactly match `T₂` and at least one of the following holds:

- `E` exactly matches `T₁` and `E` does not exactly match `T₂` ([§12.6.4.6](expressions.md#12646-exactly-matching-expression))
- `E` exactly matches both or neither of `T₁` and `T₂`, and `T₁` is a better conversion target than `T₂` ([§12.6.4.7](expressions.md#12647-better-conversion-target))
- `C₁` is not a conditional expression conversion and `C₂` is a conditional expression conversion.
- `E` exactly matches both or neither of `T₁` and `T₂`, and `T₁` is a better conversion target than `T₂` ([§12.6.4.7](expressions.md#12647-better-conversion-target)) and either `C₁` and `C₂` are both conditional expression conversions or neither is a conditional expression conversion.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I need to figure out what this is about - but E can't exactly match T2 given line 1113, so it can't match both T1 and T2...

- `E` is a method group ([§12.2](expressions.md#122-expression-classifications)), `T₁` is compatible ([§21.4](delegates.md#214-delegate-compatibility)) with the single best method from the method group for conversion `C₁`, and `T₂` is not compatible with the single best method from the method group for conversion `C₂`

#### 12.6.4.6 Exactly matching expression
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -3738,7 +3739,7 @@
;
```

A *cast_expression* of the form `(T)E`, where `T` is a type and `E` is a *unary_expression*, performs an explicit conversion ([§10.3](conversions.md#103-explicit-conversions)) of the value of `E` to type `T`. If no explicit conversion exists from `E` to `T`, a binding-time error occurs. Otherwise, the result is the value produced by the explicit conversion. The result is always classified as a value, even if `E` denotes a variable.
A *cast_expression* of the form `(T)E`, where `T` is a type and `E` is a *unary_expression*, performs an explicit conversion ([§10.3](conversions.md#103-explicit-conversions)) of the value of `E` to type `T`. In the presence of a conditional expression conversion (§imp-cond-expr-conv) there may be more than one possible conversion from `E` to `T`, in which case, the conditional expression conversion shall only be used as a last resort. If no explicit conversion exists from `E` to `T`, a binding-time error occurs. Otherwise, the result is the value produced by the explicit conversion. The result is always classified as a value, even if `E` denotes a variable.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm confused about this and think it would benefit from an example.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.


The grammar for a *cast_expression* leads to certain syntactic ambiguities.

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -5208,7 +5209,7 @@
If `ref` is not present, the second and third operands, `x` and `y`, of the `?:` operator control the type of the conditional expression:

- If `x` has type `X` and `y` has type `Y` then,
- If an identity conversion exists between `X` and `Y`, then the result is the best common type of a set of expressions ([§12.6.3.16](expressions.md#126316-finding-the-best-common-type-of-a-set-of-expressions)). If either type is `dynamic`, type inference prefers `dynamic` ([§8.7](types.md#87-the-dynamic-type)). If either type is a tuple type ([§8.3.11](types.md#8311-tuple-types)), type inference includes the element names when the element names in the same ordinal position match in both tuples.
- If an identity conversion exists between `X` and `Y`, then the result is the best common type of a set of expressions ([§12.6.3.16](expressions.md#126316-finding-the-best-common-type-of-a-set-of-expressions)). ***placeholder for words somehow referring to “12.6.4.5 Better conversion from expression.”*** If either type is `dynamic`, type inference prefers `dynamic` ([§8.7](types.md#87-the-dynamic-type)). If either type is a tuple type ([§8.3.11](types.md#8311-tuple-types)), type inference includes the element names when the element names in the same ordinal position match in both tuples.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm hoping @BillWagner can provide motivation for this via an example.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

- Otherwise, if an implicit conversion ([§10.2](conversions.md#102-implicit-conversions)) exists from `X` to `Y`, but not from `Y` to `X`, then `Y` is the type of the conditional expression.
- Otherwise, if an implicit enumeration conversion ([§10.2.4](conversions.md#1024-implicit-enumeration-conversions)) exists from `X` to `Y`, then `Y` is the type of the conditional expression.
- Otherwise, if an implicit enumeration conversion ([§10.2.4](conversions.md#1024-implicit-enumeration-conversions)) exists from `Y` to `X`, then `X` is the type of the conditional expression.
Expand Down
Loading