Skip to content

chore: use global renovate config for common field settings - #118

Merged
michael-valdron merged 1 commit into
devfile:mainfrom
michael-valdron:global-renovate-config
Nov 3, 2026
Merged

michael-valdron merged 1 commit into
devfile:mainfrom
michael-valdron:global-renovate-config

Conversation

@michael-valdron

@michael-valdron michael-valdron commented Oct 28, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description of Changes

Uses global renovate config for common field settings instead of repeating per repository.

Related Issue(s)

devfile/api#1719

Acceptance Criteria

Tests

  • Test Coverage
    • Are your changes sufficiently tested, and are any applicable test cases added or updated to cover your changes?
  • Gosec scans

Documentation

  • Does the registry operator documentation need to be updated with your changes?

Tests Performed

Explain what tests you personally ran to ensure the changes are functioning as expected.

How To Test

Instructions for the reviewer on how to test your changes.

Running Unit Tests

Running Integration Tests

Notes To Reviewer

Any notes you would like to include for the reviewer.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated automated dependency update configuration. There are no changes to app features or behavior for end users.

Signed-off-by: Michael Valdron <mvaldron@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci
openshift-ci Bot requested review from elsony and thepetk October 28, 2026 21:57
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 28, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review in Change Stack →

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review.

Recent review info
Run configuration
  • Source mode: Auto
  • Repository: Unavailable
  • Branch: Unavailable
  • File: No configuration file from this repository applied
  • Commit: Unavailable
  • Layers: defaults
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: e55ed69b-dcb9-44ad-bb50-60fc5d0d07b3
Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 33e71f8 and 2bf0185.

Files selected for processing: 1
  • .github/renovate.json

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

Walkthrough

The Renovate configuration now extends a shared preset. It removes the explicit schedule, timezone, vulnerability alert setting, pull request limits, and Renovate label.

Changes: Renovate configuration

Layer / File(s) Summary
Use shared Renovate preset
.github/renovate.json
The configuration extends local>devfile/.github:renovate-config instead of listing the prior presets. It removes the explicit schedule, timezone, vulnerability alert setting, pull request limits, and renovatebot label.

Priority: Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~4 minutes

Change: Other

Suggested reviewers: ysinghc

Merge Risk: Minimal · up to 2bf01

The Renovate configuration adopts the shared preset without an established effective behavior regression.

Pre-merge checks: Passed 5
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check Passed The title clearly and concisely describes the main change: using a global Renovate configuration for common settings.
Docstring Coverage Passed No eligible functions found in the changed files. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff with cyclomatic complexity of at least 2. Documentat…
Linked Issues check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No eligible functions found in the changed files. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff with cyclomatic complexity of at least 2. Documentation-only edits and deletions within surviving functions are included; unchanged diff context and fully deleted functions are excluded. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

Finishing Touches: 💡 1
🛠️ Fix failing CI checks: 💡
  • Commit to this branch
  • Create a new PR
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create a new PR
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Oct 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@michael-valdron: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/v4.18-registry-operator-integration-test 2bf0185 link true /test v4.18-registry-operator-integration-test

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Nov 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Jdubrick, michael-valdron

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [Jdubrick,michael-valdron]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@michael-valdron
michael-valdron merged commit bd3dbec into devfile:main Nov 3, 2026
8 of 11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants