add missing #line directive to misra.py

[driftregion]

Hello cppcheck maintainer. Thank you for your work.

The #line preprocessor directive (standard since C90) was missing from misra.py, leading to false positives in my analysis. I have added it here.

See:
https://en.cppreference.com/c/preprocessor/line

[danmar]

This is an AI review. Take it with a grain of salt and feel free to reject it by resolving the comment.

The fix looks right to me: #line is a standard directive, and with this change the 20.13 false positive is gone.

Could you add a regression test? One option that doesn't shift any line numbers in addons/test/misra/misra-test.c is to replace the empty line after #else1 // 20.13 (line 1946) with:

#line 1947

I tried it with the same commands CI uses (cppcheck --dump -DDUMMY --suppress=uninitvar --inline-suppr misra/misra-test.c --std=c89 --platform=unix64 + misra.py -verify). Without your fix it reports Not expected: misra/misra-test.c:1946 20.13, and with your fix it passes.

[driftregion]

Hi Daniel, thanks for your work maintaining cppcheck. I had a look at the AI reviews on #8879, #8876, and cppcheck-opensource/simplecpp#704 just now. They seem reasonable. Before I go about addressing them, I'd like to request your human opinion on whether you endorse the AI-proposed changes. This statement makes it clear that the review was AI-generated (great idea btw), but leaves me with some confusion about whether the human in the loop endorses its content:

This is an AI review. Take it with a grain of salt and feel free to reject it by resolving the comment.

Thanks!