Add toJSONDiff and toJSONDiff' - #11
Open
marcosh wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Owner
|
@marcosh again apologies for the very late reply I'm not sure I'm a great fan of this as it stands, because you're putting two strongly typed objects together and generating a weakly typed I think if one wants to do this it's better just to be explicit by saying:
If you want an actual function that works on and maybe that makes sense, but keep in mind that now
So I'm not sure this is wise either. Happy for your thoughts on this. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Generate patches for types with a ToJSON instance.
It makes sense to me to have such a function at the library level.
If this makes sense to you, let me know if you think that the new functions should be tested somehow