Skip to content

Regenerate for the experimental RoaringLookupResources Materialize API - #433

Merged
josephschorr merged 2 commits into
authzed:mainfrom
josephschorr:experimental-roaring-lookup-resources
Sep 16, 2026
Merged

josephschorr merged 2 commits into
authzed:mainfrom
josephschorr:experimental-roaring-lookup-resources

Conversation

@josephschorr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Regenerates the proto bindings for authzed/api#175, which added ExperimentalRoaringLookupResources to authzed.api.materialize.v0: given a resource type, a permission, and a subject, it returns a roaring64 bitmap (RoaringFormatSpec 64-bit portable format) of the IDs of every resource of that type on which the subject has the permission.

  • Bumps BufTag to BSR commit b7434c00783744819f061e14d2479b02 (the commit published from that merge; the only schema delta from the previously pinned tag is the new proto).
  • Adds the four generated files for roaringlookupresources.proto (.pb.go, .pb.validate.go, _grpc.pb.go, _vtproto.pb.go).
  • Version-file and apidocs.swagger.json updates fall out of the regeneration.

No hand-written code: same shape as #360 (the ExperimentalCountRelationshipsByFilter regeneration). go build ./..., go vet, and go test ./proto/... pass.

@josephschorr
josephschorr requested a review from a team as a code owner September 16, 2026 17:56
Resolves GO-2026-6348, which govulncheck reports against v1.82.1 and
which fails the lint workflow for every branch until bumped.
@josephschorr
josephschorr force-pushed the experimental-roaring-lookup-resources branch from 3238e2b to 522d7cf Compare September 16, 2026 18:00

@tstirrat15 tstirrat15 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@josephschorr
josephschorr merged commit d9b44f3 into authzed:main Sep 16, 2026
10 of 11 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions Bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 16, 2026
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants