docs: add a "AI-Generated PR Disclosure" section to AGENTS.md

[kevinjqliu]

Follow up to #15529

Add a section for self-disclosure, esp when PRs themselves are created by an agent.
I have seen several newly opened PR that seem to be fully generated; it would be nice to have some kind of indication on the PR description.

[huaxingao]

Thanks @kevinjqliu for the PR! Should we also talk about AI generated reviews? Maybe add something like "Similarly, if you use AI tools to review PRs, please review the comments for accuracy before posting. Auto-posting AI-generated comments without human review is discouraged."

[RussellSpitzer]

I generally don't have strong feelings about this in Agent.MD

On the con side, everything we put in here is essentially a cost in tokens for all users so I want to make sure it's useful
On the pro side, it would nice to auto mark

I would recommend we go over the text though and have less "if then" comments and more straight instructions.

No need to say "if you are doing this with ai" just say "PR's include this disclosure box after the description"

[manuzhang]

Why don't we add such a section to the PR template like https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE?

[jbonofre]

If the code is generated, the copyright doesn't apply.

[jbonofre]

That's good. I think the ash header/copyright should be documented here if the code is AI generated. See the asf guidelines.

[jbonofre]

For reference, here's the updated guidelines https://www.apache.org/legal/generative-tooling.html

Included the Generated-By mention

[github-actions]

This pull request has been marked as stale due to 30 days of inactivity. It will be closed in 1 week if no further activity occurs. If you think that’s incorrect or this pull request requires a review, please simply write any comment. If closed, you can revive the PR at any time and @mention a reviewer or discuss it on the dev@iceberg.apache.org list. Thank you for your contributions.

[kevinjqliu]

thanks for the reviews!

picking this back up, i've edited the instructions based on reviews. Added a sentence on PR review as well.

I'll create a separate PR for the pull request template

[kevinjqliu]

added pr template in #16267

[qzyu999]

Hi @kevinjqliu, thanks for the AGENTS.md update. A bit off-topic, but it is possible to add a (nearly empty) CLAUDE.md and have it symlink (via ln -s AGENTS.md CLAUDE.md) so Claude code users can benefit, the same way it's done in Airflow: https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/CLAUDE.md. This may deserve a separate issue in itself though.

[kevinjqliu]

is possible to add a (nearly empty) CLAUDE.md

i remember AGENTS.md was chosen to be vendor agnostic, i think claude can also read from AGENTS.md

[qzyu999]

is possible to add a (nearly empty) CLAUDE.md

i remember AGENTS.md was chosen to be vendor agnostic, i think claude can also read from AGENTS.md

Hi @kevinjqliu, from their own docs, https://code.claude.com/docs/en/memory#agents-md, they mention that Claude won't read it automatically:

Claude Code reads CLAUDE.md, not AGENTS.md. If your repository already uses AGENTS.md for other coding agents, create a CLAUDE.md that imports it so both tools read the same instructions without duplicating them. You can also add Claude-specific instructions below the import. Claude loads the imported file at session start, then appends the rest:

for example, CLAUDE.md:

@AGENTS.md

Claude Code

Use plan mode for changes under src/billing/.

I don't use Claude Code directly myself, but it sounds to me like Claude Code users would benefit from a CLAUDE.md file that simply has the line: @AGENTS.md and it would solve the problem for them.

Looks like users have requested the feature, but Anthropic is not going with it yet: anthropics/claude-code#6235.