Repository navigation
Conversation
The owner (2026-10-26) put #918 on hold until a comprehensive scientific consistency audit across the core OI physics corpus is complete. This plan fixes the objects (the Introduction at 4a260ca; the corpus at main b64919c), the scope (core papers, book appendices and physics chapters, Lean modules, verification records), and the method in the owner's six steps: proof inventory, claim-to-proof mapping, status verification, cross-paper consistency, independent review, and a final landing gate. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013T6pfKuv5mi3MXtKjH2tZb
…urces as findings Aligns step 3 with the reviewed whole-framework scope rule (#940). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013T6pfKuv5mi3MXtKjH2tZb
Owner (2026-10-26): the audit is a completeness audit as well as an overclaim audit, recorded as a claim-to-proof matrix (claim, strongest verified source, assumptions, status, contradictions); a more detailed document does not outrank a less detailed but more rigorous one. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013T6pfKuv5mi3MXtKjH2tZb
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013T6pfKuv5mi3MXtKjH2tZb
Step 2a: every substantive claim in papers/Introduction.md at 4a260ca, I-001 to I-385 in document order, with verbatim spans (script-checked against the blob), stated status, citations and, for the 11 equivalences, 24 direction sub-claims (Section A.34). 35 entries carry attention notes for the mapping step. Build scripts in scripts/. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013T6pfKuv5mi3MXtKjH2tZb
Step 1: 142 displayed statements (122 from proof_census, 20 more found by hand) with ledger levels, hypotheses, kernel anchors and the actual proof location (inline, elsewhere in the paper, companion paper, kernel-only, external, not written, none located); 55 named hypotheses and Main's posit ledger; 28 ROADMAP obligations; 64 appendix-A rows with recounted totals; 285 cited kernel declarations. PROOFS-README lists the gaps and early consistency signals S1-S13, unresolved. Files changed by #939 were read at eae0164; build scripts in scripts/proofs/ (they expect a git-archive extraction of the corpus commit). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013T6pfKuv5mi3MXtKjH2tZb
74 rows: 64 FAITHFUL, 9 IMPRECISE, 1 MISCITED. Main finding I-225: the Page-value sentence omits that GR Theorem A.8 counts initial conditions as definite configurations, where H-scramble fails for every bijection. Corpus findings for CONSISTENCY (GR A.8 setting, 'resolved' headings, GR (iii) on hbar after #939, GR:573 unconditional) recorded, not edited. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013T6pfKuv5mi3MXtKjH2tZb
77 rows: 74 FAITHFUL, 2 IMPRECISE (I-124, I-383), 1 UNSUPPORTED (I-123, 'a minimal model' with six hidden states: no measure makes it true). All 28 Appendix A declarations resolve and match their glosses; the retained axiom report has exactly propext/Classical.choice/Quot.sound per declaration. Appendix B numbers re-verified exactly (scripts/b5_check.py). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013T6pfKuv5mi3MXtKjH2tZb
99 rows: 91 FAITHFUL, 1 UNDERCLAIM (I-071: the independent-prior realization holds for every finite-horizon law, Main:498/715, not only rational ones), 1 MISCITED (I-052), 6 IMPRECISE. Theorem 1 kernel-checked in each direction (S_imp_D, D_imp_Qfb, Qfb_imp_S). The 'exact probe' convention overstates a floating-point probe (I-054). Omissions noted for the completeness step. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013T6pfKuv5mi3MXtKjH2tZb
71 rows: 60 FAITHFUL, 8 IMPRECISE, 3 UNDERCLAIM. I-258/I-281: which of (iii)-(v) the substratum supplies is partly settled in the kernel (the stated substratum does not supply (iv); with one continuous control resource it gives exact finite QM; ROADMAP F2 remains open). I-292: exact gluing is settled for rooted families (finiteRootedRealizable_iff _pper). Lean toolchain and axiom claims confirmed against the retained record. The [Main] title is flagged for the owner. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013T6pfKuv5mi3MXtKjH2tZb
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013T6pfKuv5mi3MXtKjH2tZb
90 rows: 75 FAITHFUL, 1 OVERCLAIM (I-127: a Markov law is P-divisible, so 'no unconditional implication' is too strong), 1 UNDERCLAIM (I-146: the substratum-sourcing results in GR and the kernel), 1 MISCITED (I-121: the storage-time routed-readback declaration matches the wording), 1 UNSUPPORTED, 11 IMPRECISE. Theorem 3's general form is kernel-only; quantum-equivalence status summarized across Main, GR, book, ROADMAP. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013T6pfKuv5mi3MXtKjH2tZb
matrix/scripts/merge_matrix.py merges parts B1-B5 and checks coverage: all 385 claims and 24 direction sub-claims present exactly once (I-123 and I-124 kept from B2, the owning range). Verdicts: 364 FAITHFUL, 35 IMPRECISE, 5 UNDERCLAIM, 3 MISCITED, 1 OVERCLAIM, 1 UNSUPPORTED. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013T6pfKuv5mi3MXtKjH2tZb
Step 5 and the corpus-wide part of step 4, at main eae0164. Completeness: 26 established results omitted or understated (2 high: the epsilon-realization and gluing results, Main:544-580; the substratum-sourcing results in GR and the kernel). Consistency: 48 discrepancies (1 high: GR Theorem A.8 counts aligned configurations, in which H-scramble fails for every bijection), 23 touching the Introduction, 6 on lines #939 edited; early signals S1-S13 each resolved into a row. Discrepancies outside the Introduction are recorded for separate correction, not edited. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013T6pfKuv5mi3MXtKjH2tZb
FINDINGS.md (synthesis): 32 required changes to the Introduction (5 overclaim or unsupported, 5 underclaim or omission, 9 miscitation, 13 imprecision), 25 optional, 15 owner decisions, 8 proposed corpus correction PRs, what the Introduction gets right, and method and limits. Recorded by the coordinator from the synthesis agent's report. MATRIX.md is rendered from matrix.json by matrix/scripts/render_matrix.py (--check passes), with dependency blocks for Theorems 1-4, the Corollary, the capacity and readback bounds and the section 4 and 5 chains. matrix/resolutions.json applies the four verdicts the synthesis re-checked (I-008, I-013, I-123, I-124), keeping each mapper verdict. COMPLETENESS CMP-10 now cites CON-17 to CON-19. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013T6pfKuv5mi3MXtKjH2tZb
Step 7 checks the evidence behind every result the Introduction cites, by type (Lean certificates, formal coverage, exhaustive computations, numerical results, CI receipts, open obligations), and records each claim's evidence level: reproduced, certificate-checked or traced-only. The audit is complete only when this layer has passed independent review. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013T6pfKuv5mi3MXtKjH2tZb
…ges applied review/INDEPENDENT-REVIEW.md: confirms coverage, 44 of 47 non-FAITHFUL verdicts and all 40 sampled FAITHFUL rows; requires RC-1 to RC-12. Applied: R-01 restated (GR A.8 has no instance in its counted setting; BHb C2 bound), R-02 with its assumptions (positive-probability roots, a multi-time law, 0<t<n), R-07 in full with the abstract clause, R-06's permutation-operator premise and 'as formalized' label, R-10 in two stages, R-19's evidence; new R-33 (I-291 numerical claim) and R-34 (the central narrative). resolutions.json re-rates I-225 (OVERCLAIM, unsupported), I-223, I-286, I-291, I-040, fixes I-123/I-124 fields, and introduces the exhaustive-exact status (RC-12); merge_matrix applies status and fix overrides; C-completeness-data regenerates the committed outputs. Verdicts now 358 FAITHFUL of 409; 34 required changes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013T6pfKuv5mi3MXtKjH2tZb
…verbatim span Summary counts optional changes as 23 (O-7 and O-12 moved to required); OD-2's short form is withdrawn; OD-13's superseded word figures removed; (e) says 358 FAITHFUL and two OVERCLAIM verdicts; R-34 quotes L26 in full. The independent re-check of 1832418 accepts once these are fixed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013T6pfKuv5mi3MXtKjH2tZb
… fixed in 75fdc2f) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013T6pfKuv5mi3MXtKjH2tZb
…bligations (E3) E1: 122 items over 65 kernel declarations; 111 pass, 11 partial, 0 fail; 120 certificate-checked against digest-verified CI job logs at 17b830b, eae0164 and 02e73e5 (gate 22/22, exactly propext / Classical.choice / Quot.sound, no sorry/axiom/native_decide in OIBridge). No local Lean, so nothing is reproduced; every checked job replayed its build from cache. E3: 36 items; 26 pass, 10 partial, 0 fail; the BH-01/BH-02 replays reproduce result.json byte for byte (including 1376/40320, 60, 32); 12 matrix claims rest on modules whose axiom reports are only in expiring CI logs. Owner authorization is needed for a fresh-build CI reproduction. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013T6pfKuv5mi3MXtKjH2tZb
20 items: 18 reproduced with exact or exhaustive scripts (the section-5 counts 1376/40320, 60, 32, 14496, 36416; BHa item F; BHb C6(c); every Appendix B number; the three-hidden-state model; the section-4 orders of magnitude), 1 traced-only, 1 failed. The failure is E2-10: 'with exact probes' (L84) and Main:170 'Certified exactly' are not met by c4_backflow_probes.py (floating point, tolerance decisions, five named instances), confirming R-03 and CON-25. CON-26 is resolved exactly: Main's '1 of 15' and the audit's '2 of 16' are the same fact, and the counterexample holds over all priors. The audit's b5_check.py hard-codes one value and omits a/(2-a); E2 computes both. BHa/BHb mutant replays need owner-authorized CI. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013T6pfKuv5mi3MXtKjH2tZb
…rix row; b5_check fixes E4_aggregate.py reads matrix.json's chains and the 178 items of evidence/part-E1..E3.json and assigns every matrix row an evidence level (reproduced, certificate-checked, traced-only, or failed) by a stated rule: kernel links match E1's per-declaration certificate and coverage items (the weaker of the two), file-sourced kernel links match the items naming the file, computation links match E2's items for the row, a row takes its weakest evidence-bearing link, a row with none takes its CI-receipt items where it has them, and any failed item fails the row. It writes evidence.json and renders EVIDENCE.md (PLAN.md's step-7 outputs). merge_matrix.py copies each row's level into matrix.json; render_matrix.py shows it as a column with a summary, under a control that the counts agree. No other matrix field changes. Result: 409 rows: 67 reproduced, 153 certificate-checked, 187 traced-only, 2 failed (I-054, I-103: E2-10, the "exact probes" form). Of the 237 rows with an evidence-bearing link, 28 stay traced-only, each with its gap listed. EVIDENCE.md also lists matrix labels that disagree with their chains (status implying an artifact with no such link; kernel-layer links that cite paper, ledger or roadmap lines), as corrections not applied. b5_check.py: B.2's I(X0;X2|X1) is now computed exactly from the joint law (1 bit; countercontrolled on independent, copied and constant laws), and the three-hidden-state variant's P(x2=0|x1=1) is computed for general a: a/(2-a), as R-04 states. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y87wExth9RoUb3dtbumhTb
|
Checkpoint This session is now #942's writer, at the owner's direction. It continues from the handoff on #941. What changed
Result
Checks: Still proposed for owner authorization, not dispatched:
#918 stays on hold. No merge, dispatch or manuscript change is requested. Generated by Claude Code |
- E4_aggregate.py: grade each row on its load-bearing links (kernel links for proved-kernel; all links for proved-paper, exhaustive-exact, numerical and calibration, with paper and literature steps traced-only); open, conditional, conjecture and unsupported rows are traced-only, with an artifact level (counter-evidence for refuted rows). CI receipts set a level only for all-none (build, CI, records) chains. Per-link computation matching rejects items naming other records or probes; formal-coverage items carry not_covered per claim; a matched fail fails the link; failed rows carry the item's failure scope. --check now compares every matrix.json row's level and basis with evidence.json; render_matrix.py checks the same. - matrix/chain-relabels.json, applied by merge_matrix.py with mapper_layer kept: kernel-labelled paper, ledger and ROADMAP links (I-042, I-052, I-063, I-258, I-281, I-282), I-309's git check and I-044's records link. - E2-07 rests on the BHb checks.py replay; E2_bh02.py's C1 sweep now evolves dense vectors and takes exact ranks, with countercontrols and a caught mutant. E2-11 fails L56's tag (L30's definition); E2-10/E2-11 carry a failure scope. E2-19 retyped ci-receipt; E2-12 and E2-17 list I-368, I-370, I-379, I-172. - E3-14 and EVIDENCE.md limits: log-text vs structured axiom certificate, 9 of 14 modules without an observed fresh elaboration; DOI/archive unchecked. - b5_check.py: in-file countercontrols; review/EVIDENCE-REVIEW.md retained. Levels: 43 reproduced, 130 certificate-checked, 233 traced-only, 3 failed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y87wExth9RoUb3dtbumhTb
|
Checkpoint Required changes
Optional changes
Levels (409 rows): 43 reproduced, 130 certificate-checked, 233 traced-only, 3 failed. The failed rows are I-054, I-071 and I-103, all failures of an evidence tag. Checks: Generated by Claude Code |
… optional) - N1: drop the relabels of I-042, I-052, I-258 and I-281 (kernel-proved steps sourced to paper lines that cite the kernel); they keep the kernel layer and grade traced-only until sourced to declarations. I-052, I-258 traced-only. - N2: a computation link naming manuscript lines and no record or probe is matched only by items naming those manuscript files; I-227 traced-only. E2-12 now names the book card table (ch01:277-280), which it was checked against, so I-361 to I-364 keep reproduced. - N3: merge_matrix.py --check compares matrix.json with the merge of the parts and overlays; E4 --check fails when matrix.json's chains do not carry exactly the chain-relabels corrections. Both mutations caught. - E1-98's not_covered reason for I-088 corrected; E1-71 does not cover I-149 (compose exactly across times). E2-11's failure scope names its reading of L30. I-384, I-385 listed by E3-16/E3-17/E3-18. - E2_bh02.py: orbit-fixed-point control (N!) catches a non-applied permutation. b5_check.py exits 1 on a failed countercontrol. E4 docstring and EVIDENCE.md rule text match the code. review/EVIDENCE-RECHECK-818bcd60.md retained. Levels: 44 reproduced, 127 certificate-checked, 235 traced-only, 3 failed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y87wExth9RoUb3dtbumhTb
|
Checkpoint N1, relabels that raised rows. The relabels of I-042, I-052, I-258 and I-281 are dropped. Those links are kernel-proved steps sourced to paper lines that cite the kernel, so they keep the kernel layer and grade traced-only until they are sourced to declarations. I-052 and I-258 are now traced-only. N2, I-227 on finite sweeps. A computation link that names manuscript lines, and no record or probe, now matches only items that name those manuscript files. I-227 is now traced-only. E2-12 now names the book card table it was checked against (ch01:277–280 at N3, chains drifting from their sources. Two new controls:
Both of the reviewer's mutations are now caught: a relabel edited without re-running the merge, and a part file edited alone. Optional items:
Levels (409 rows): 44 reproduced, 127 certificate-checked, 235 traced-only, 3 failed. Checks: all three Generated by Claude Code |
- C1: a computation link rejected under the manuscript rule now states that the listed items do not name its manuscript file (I-227), not that they name other records or probes. - The rule text says the manuscript match is by file, not by line range. - review/EVIDENCE-RECHECK-8f6ea594.md retained. Levels unchanged: 44 reproduced, 127 certificate-checked, 235 traced-only, 3 failed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y87wExth9RoUb3dtbumhTb
|
Checkpoint
Optional, not applied: relabelling I-227's GR and book links as paper-derivation, which would record its reproduced sweeps as the row's artifact level. Its evidence level stays traced-only either way. Remains for owner authorization (not dispatched):
Generated by Claude Code |
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y87wExth9RoUb3dtbumhTb
…ded OI-explains-QM form
The release gate's claims step flagged PLAN.md:163 ("how far OI explains
quantum mechanics") since 49b1e93; the sentence now names what the audit
measures, what the results establish and under which assumptions.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y87wExth9RoUb3dtbumhTb
… PRs (#956-#958) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y87wExth9RoUb3dtbumhTb
…to their current heads Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y87wExth9RoUb3dtbumhTb
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y87wExth9RoUb3dtbumhTb
…; #958 main CI green Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y87wExth9RoUb3dtbumhTb
…; #956 main CI green Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y87wExth9RoUb3dtbumhTb
…; #957 main CI green Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y87wExth9RoUb3dtbumhTb
R1. ch15 :152, :154, :184: F = 1 is saturated revival (𝒩 = 𝒩_max at small τS/τB), not complete revival (𝒩 = 1, §18.3). The short-region case is the proposal's sub-saturated 0 < F < 1. Because 𝒩_max ≤ 1, the §15.8 relation places it inside 0 < 𝒩 < 1 whenever τS/τB < 1. R2. ch15 :197, :198, :210: G² non-monotonicity is the proposal's prediction. A density autocorrelation is not a distinguishability, and "certifies P-indivisibility" is dropped. The :168 observable and step 5 use the total-variation distance of the visible population laws. R3. ch09 :285: partial revival is predicted at marginal capacity (N_H/N_V ∼ 1), not at every finite ratio. R4. The exact probes the record relies on are landed byte-identical to their 42bbd33 blobs under tracks/SC22-N-regime/: regime_exact, blp_unbounded and enum_window, each .py with its .out, checked with git hash-object. The rewrite-list check is restated as provenance. ch18 :86 (coordinator decision): "A memoryless (divisible) density-matrix description requires …". Optional, applied: - d is fixed to the total variation of the visible population laws (ch18 :74, glossary :125), with [Main §2.3] cited for periodicity; - "does not by itself" at ch18 :80 and ch15 :144; - ch09 :283 "can be satisfied"; - ch18 :72 typo; - ch13 :134 "in the literature". Every chapter edit is mirrored exactly in FULL. Book regenerated (558 pages). The release gate passes except lean-axioms (no lake locally), and edge_rigidity_probe passes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y87wExth9RoUb3dtbumhTb
…records of #959 and #961-#968 CORRECTIONS-LEDGER.md records, per unit, the original flaw, the corrected claim, the evidence level, the affected manuscripts, the verification artifacts and the merge status (owner request). The review records are saved verbatim from the reviewers' reports. Local filesystem paths are redacted to repo-relative paths in 957-REVIEW-b25dcfc4.md, and two uncommitted reviewer scratch scripts in matrix/part-B4.md are named without their scratch paths. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y87wExth9RoUb3dtbumhTb
|
PR-AUDIT-1 (#1088): closing without merge Owner decision (amaybaum, Claude Code session chat, 2026-11-04):
This PR's audit findings were reconciled against
No scientific findings of this audit are adopted by closing it. Nothing from this branch lands on The branch Generated by Claude Code |
Applies the non-material findings of the independent exact-head review of 087c9e0 and two factual cell corrections from the independent Unit 3/4 consistency check, in CLOSURE-LEDGER.md only. No status or proposed-outcome cell changes; 190 rows; status counts unchanged. - EV-L note: recorded acceptance is #942 c.6433846714; cb2029c is not on main and is provenance only. - Header: the quoted owner rulings (c.6677500012) govern wherever they select among, narrow or refuse an option offered elsewhere in the ledger. - R-03: Main:170 -> Main:176. CON-42: the implication is in Remark (two notions of memory), Main:628. rF-25: key range [Main] to [Wei89]. - X-2: FINDINGS :660 marked as off-main provenance for the Unit 4 check, and the header qualified accordingly. Introduction line count: 281 lines, the last is \endgroup. - SC-30: adds the missing destination #1029 orphan 34 (ch01:265, now :271; ch19:248; Computation:138; added by #946 c.6442678234); D-16, D-22, D-24 and D-25 recorded as having no recorded destination and not adjudicated under #941. - OD-4: separates OD-4's current families from the four kernel-only #1118 families (#1134 F-1 to F-4); census registration stays with #1118 (D10). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011zDyUSyEszk3JJx83uXKKq
Summary
This is the guiding draft PR for the scientific consistency audit the owner required before the Introduction (#918) can land. The plan is in
verification/audits/manuscript/intro-corpus-audit-20261026/PLAN.md.4a260ca9, and the corpus atmainb64919cd.Main.mdholds every proof.Status
Related
Generated by Claude Code