…bstratum hypotheses (#1029)
Minimum-change corrections to Main's posit ledger and the claims it
carries, with the same correction propagated where it is restated.
- Posit (xiii): the second-order form of the update, x(t+1) =
F(x(t)) - x(t-1), in the kernel's `ruleDynamics` form, stated as a
posit of the selected lattice model, not derived and not an axiom of
OI. Ledger count twelve -> thirteen; range (iv)-(xii) -> (iv)-(xiii).
- A5 (Main item (vii); Structure, Substratum, ch02/FULL restatements):
amplitude-scale gauge invariance yields an affine restriction (first
differences independent of the base point); linearity is a further,
imposed restriction. In the passages corrected by S1, the claimed
equivalence between amplitude-scale gauge invariance and linearity is
withdrawn. Linearity (A5) is retained as an imposed restriction of the
selected model. Remaining assertions that center freedom yields
linearity are assigned to P1 and are not corrected by this commit.
Basis: x_i(t+1) = x_{i-1}(t) + x_{i+1}(t) + 1 - x_i(t-1) on a 4-site
ring over Z/5 meets A4 as stated, is affine, and no
translation-commuting time-independent relabelling linearizes it.
- External results (Main:72, :630, :658): besides the textbook results
[15, 16], the load-bearing imports are Barandes [11, 12] for the
quantum-representation layer, [55] and canonical typicality [31].
- Main item (ii): the hypotheses of the cited Substratum results
(finite independently prepared factor with product dynamics at a
fixed interface; the alphabet-size hypothesis; the O(t/tau_B)
condition) are stated.
No Lean, LEDGER, census-registry or grade change. Main, Structure,
Substratum and the book rebuilt with build.sh (pages 100, 99, 54, 560).
sc42 integration result regenerated: one added mirror predicate for the
ch02 line, 642 checks, PASS. Same tree as the reviewed commit bac7999
(#1042), re-committed with this message.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013T6pfKuv5mi3MXtKjH2tZb
This PR is correction unit S1 of the Main proof-independence work on #1029. It is a re-cut of #1042, changing commit metadata only, as the owner decided in #1042 comment 6579764705 (option (b)). Merge is not authorized.
Re-cut
290cdce3af40cd91d51ba49d5911dca4d33486b3, one commit onmaina65fe8a8.bec590a78403385187759c156ff13191cc1d367a, identical to Main posit ledger: second-order posit, A5 scope, external results, Substratum hypotheses (#1029 S1) #1042's reviewed headbac7999f.git diff bac7999f 290cdce3is empty.Content (unchanged from #1042)
ruleDynamicsform. It is stated as a posit of the selected lattice model, not derived and not an axiom of OI. The ledger count changes from twelve to thirteen and the range from (iv)–(xii) to (iv)–(xiii).No Lean, LEDGER, census-registry or grade change, and no new citation of a downstream paper. Main, Structure, Substratum and the book are rebuilt (pages 100, 99, 54, 560). The SC-42 integration result is regenerated: 642 checks, PASS.
#1036 and #1037 stay paused, and the five standing holds (#1009, #1023, #1011, #1003, #918) are unchanged.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_013T6pfKuv5mi3MXtKjH2tZb