Modsecurity crs rules classification report #325
Conversation
🔒 OWASP Scanner ResultsVulnerabilities were detected: 🔒 OWASP Scanner Results for
|
VishalAbiman05
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security review – ModSecurity CRS report
I've reviewed this report for potential security issues. Overall, it is well-structured and does not appear to contain hardcoded secrets, real credentials, or sensitive internal IP addresses. The example paths (e.g., /cgi-bin/, /etc/passwd) are standard and safe.
Suggestions for improvement:
-
Classification header – Consider adding a visible classification label at the top of the document, such as:
Classification: Internal – Redback Team Only
This reminds readers that security analysis reports should not be shared externally. -
Redaction reminder – If any real IP addresses or domain names were used in logs, ensure they are anonymised (e.g., replace with
x.x.x.x). The current version appears safe, but a note in the methodology section about anonymisation would be good practice. -
Safe handling note – Add a short line: "This report contains security findings. Do not commit sensitive values (e.g., real tokens, live IPs) to the repository."
No blocking issues found. Happy to approve once these minor suggestions are considered.
VishalAbiman05
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security review – PR #325
I've reviewed the changes in this PR, which add a Data Protection Policy and a ModSecurity CRS rule analysis report.
What I checked:
Data Protection Policy:
- No hardcoded secrets, API keys, or tokens found
- Contains appropriate classification levels (Public, Internal, Confidential, Highly Confidential)
- Includes clear access control, encryption, and breach management sections
- Aligns with Australian Privacy Principles and ACS ethics
- Suggest adding a visible classification header at the top (e.g., "Classification: Internal – Redback Team Only") to remind readers of handling requirements
ModSecurity CRS Report:
- No hardcoded credentials or real internal IP addresses exposed
- Example paths (e.g., /cgi-bin/, /etc/passwd) are standard and safe
- Includes useful rule categorisation and security impact assessment
- Consider adding a note that this report should not be shared externally without sanitisation
Overall assessment:
No blocking security issues. Both documents are well-structured and security-aware. The policy is comprehensive and the CRS report provides valuable analysis. Good to merge after considering the minor suggestion about adding classification headers.
🔒 OWASP Scanner ResultsVulnerabilities were detected: 🔒 OWASP Scanner Results for
|
Crs rule classification report