Repository navigation
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Add two independently identified languages developed by STUDIO HAZE:
topaz-studiohazeTopaz (토파즈). Topaz is a general-purpose programming language with typesetting built in. Code that does the same job looks the same no matter who writes it. Its public compiler release source is written in Topaz and emits Rust.lispexLispex (리스펙스). Lispex is a language for writing business rules, such as a publisher's house style. It cannot touch files or the network, so it is safe to run inside any program. Its implementation provides a Rust tree interpreter, verified-bytecode VM, and resource-controlled embedding interfaces.I am submitting these records on behalf of the developer. The existing
topaz-langrecord describes the unrelated 2021 language by m-schm and is left unchanged. These additions do not assert third-party verification, adoption counts, performance advantages, or a new community/support commitment.appearedis deliberately omitted from both records: the official material checked does not establish the first public announcement/release year. Repository creation dates, copyright years, and the current release date have not been substituted. The current official Scroll test accepts both records with this omission; please advise if an editorial convention for an unknown year is required.Official sources
Topaz:
Lispex:
Validation
code/measures.parsersand declared Scroll tooling.node node_modules/scroll-cli/scroll.js test concepts/topaz-studiohaze.scroll concepts/lispex.scroll: 0 errors, 2 files.git diff --check: passed. Only these two new concept files are changed.Topaz basics: 25 minutes; Lispex 1.21.1 printed(hello "Lispex" 5). Both exited 0. This is a minimal example check, not a claim about a newer Topaz native release or cross-platform qualification.