Repository navigation
Uprate electricity_consumption and gas_consumption #1860
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
| - Uprate `electricity_consumption` and `gas_consumption`. Both variables declare CPI uprating, but were absent from `uprating_indices.yaml`, so they returned identical values in every year while every other consumption variable on the same index rose. This also restores the documented identity `domestic_energy_consumption == electricity_consumption + gas_consumption`, which held in the base year but diverged thereafter because only the combined variable was uprated. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Four more dataset columns declare
upratingbut are missing from this list, and I measured them flat 2024 → 2027 on the same dataset:water_and_sewerage_charges(declaresindices.ofwat.water_bills) — 375.34 in both yearshousing_service_charges(indices.obr.lagged_average_earnings) — 91.89pension_contributions_via_salary_sacrifice(indices.obr.average_earnings) — 417.07rail_usage(gov.dft.rail.ridership_index) — 483.10Also
savings_interest_incomedeclaresindices.ons.household_interest_income, but this file appliesper_capita.gdpto it.Since the class attribute is never read, the durable fix is a code-health test (natural home:
policyengine_uk/tests/code_health/) asserting that every variable declaringupratingappears in this file under the matching index. Two of the four above point at indices that may have noyoy_growthparameter yet, so they probably need their own PR — but the guard would make the gap visible instead of silent.