Repository navigation
Add Claude Haiku 5.5 and move the references to policyengine-us 2.38.6 (release dashboard-data-20261010, 47 models) - #208
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
docs/haiku55/spec.json lists d1022's eight records (pinned by sha256 in reference_audit/2026-10-05-reference-adversary/proposed_changes.json) and d994's two Louisiana records (reference_audit/2026-10-05-louisiana/ proposed_exclusions.json, reference_law_published_after_freeze: the 2026 return amount Louisiana published, $12,838, came after the freeze), with their adjudication classes and reasoning. - install-exclusions writes release 20261006's 64 records plus the ten into the stage and rebinds the record in stage.json. - adjudicate-exclusions decides the ten from each case's bound Opus 5.5 verdict, restating scenario_051's 2026-09-22 regeneration in place. - Triage accepts exactly those entries and the 2026-10-06 wave in the date conventions. - Export requires 1,910 scored outputs per model and, with 20261006's record put back, byte-identical incumbent modelStats. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The excluded-output note said the frozen value of a
reference_law_published_after_freeze record "used the engine's
projection". Louisiana's $12,835 (d994), the first such record, is a
computation from published CPI-U, not a projection, so the note now says
"the engine's own figure", which fits both. The Louisiana records state the
ruling as the earlier records do ("decision d994"). Adds Claude Haiku 5.5's
display name to the paper and app rosters for the release that folds it in.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… remote cost map The card review of #201 found that the parametrized registration test reads litellm's already-loaded map, which the remote fetch can fill, so it passes without the local entry. This test disables the remote map in a subprocess, checks the bundled backup lacks the newest ids, and requires each locally registered model at its override prices. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… three driver bugs - scripts/freeze_haiku55.py adapts freeze_gpt61sol.py. It rebuilds the payload from the receipt-bound stage, checks the installed exclusions, and writes the snapshot (74-record exclusion record), annotations, pointer and version label. It appends this release's wording amendments to release 20261006's committed list rather than replacing it. - tests/test_finish_haiku55.py ports the GPT-6.1 Sol driver tests and covers the new steps (reworded cases, spec records, exclusion build, ruled adjudications, date conventions, install, the scope gate), with Hypothesis properties. tests/test_freeze_haiku55.py does the same for the freeze, on fixtures only. - docs/haiku55/design.md: procedure, gates and invariants. Driver fixes the new tests caught: - a restated scenario_051 was rebuilt with release 20261006's judge fields, so triage, export and the freeze would refuse it; - reworded_since_seed compared rows with their pandas index, so a reordered file would read as reworded; - a re-export after the freeze was refused at the committed exclusion record, which the freeze replaces with the release's. The spec's record_edits now name each engine defect's upstream fix (#9928, #9946, #9948, merged 2026-10-09; Ohio #10020, open, #9925 related). The later-law docstring no longer calls the frozen value a projection. 592 passed, 2 skipped, 1 strict xfail (the spec's adjudications_written_on, set when the adjudication step runs). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
--step provenance builds docs/haiku55/judge_provenance.json from each re-opened case's sidecar: its hashes, its sidecar fields with addresses withheld, and its group by declared account (the pb-judge setup-token login, or subfleet lane claude-18's token for the cases judged after that login's weekly limit). It then runs verify_judge_provenance on the result, so export's gate holds by construction. Tests cover the grouping, the refusals and, locally, the live stage. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
BASE_COMMIT is #202's merge on main (9ce4ade), BASE_SHA256 the shipped payload aa34e5c9..., and the exclusion pin the shipped record (92741dfd..., whose two scenario_081 sentences the release's review reworded). Reference explanations, values, scenarios and predictions are unchanged, so every staged prompt and verdict still binds. The design note's base table follows. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The spec names 2026-10-09 as the day the ten ruled outputs' decisions were written (adjudicate-exclusions). docs/haiku55/judge_provenance.json lists the 231 new Opus 5.5 verdicts: 210 on the pb-judge setup-token login and 21 on subfleet lane claude-18's token after that login's weekly limit. Each was judged isolated with a token login, and every transcript passes the runner's checks. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…ewer policyengine-us) Generalized from reference_audit/2026-09-28/scripts/build_references_latest.py (#182). Reads release 20261006 from git, recomputes all 1,984 outputs with the pinned pre-freeze conventions, and gates every move against an actions file: approved scored moves, regenerated engine-defect exclusions, new exclusions, and rechecked excluded outputs that keep their decided values (rule 5). Narratives regenerate the explanation of each changed output. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
EngineUpgrade and its accessors key the paper's figures to the last upgrade, keep the September (2.15.17) facts pinned to that revision, and rebuild the exclusion record and references as they stood on any date. A mock second upgrade (tests/second_engine_upgrade.py, labelled mock data) exercises them. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Gates a reference build against release 20261006 before writing anything, renders the audit it gives in memory, installs it in place, sets aside only the verdicts whose prompts change, and holds every later step (exclusions, adjudications, triage, export) to the installed build. The freeze refuses an upgraded stage until it learns to carry one. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…tale record A 20261006 engine-defect record decided on 1.755.4 keeps that engine's corrected value, which other engine changes have since moved (scenario_005 federal: record 107,198.34; the fix module on 2.35.3 gives 108,525.58). A regeneration now names its audited target: the record's alternative_value (kind record), or its fix modules' corrected value on an older engine that still has the defect, from a committed evidence file (kind fix_modules). The builder applies the modules again on the new engine and refuses if they still move the output; the driver re-derives the target from the evidence file and the modules committed at BASE_COMMIT. Evidence mode writes that file. Also: copy r19_irs_sales_tax_2025.json beside the conventions it serves, and write the judge provenance record with indent=1 as docs/gpt61sol's is. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
24 engine-defect outputs, each on 2.37.2 with the pinned conventions alone and with its audited fix modules after them. Every module still moves its output beyond $1 there, so each defect is present on 2.37.2; the corrected values are the targets a later engine's regeneration must land on. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…vidence Runs the builder's regeneration gate early: each evidence item must land within $1 of its corrected value, and its fix modules must leave it unchanged, on the policyengine-us that PYTHONPATH puts first. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
docs/haiku55/spec.json's upgrade_adjudications holds one item per output the installed build newly excludes (the Indiana county cells), in the ruled adjudications' shape. adjudicate-exclusions appends each one's entry, built from its item, its build record and its case's bound verdict and dated by the record; the date conventions then name the upgrade's wave, with the day the spec says its decisions were written. Triage's gate holds the staged record to exactly those entries, so every excluded output stays decided. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Renders byte for byte as before. The upgrade facts move to r.september_upgrade and r.excluded_outputs_by_engine_version_phrase, so a second engine upgrade can add its own without changing them. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…their merges Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Max, 2026-10-09: wait for the fixed engine and regenerate the cells it fixes. The spec now names d1022's four defect cells as regenerated by the upgrade, decides the two Indiana county outputs the upgrade newly excludes (upgrade_adjudications), and dates those decisions. The Idaho approval's basis cites policyengine-us #9810 and Idaho Code 63-3082. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The builder and policybench.paper_results name it "record"; the driver read "removed_record", which only its mock build wrote, so a real build failed install-references. A local test now runs the 2.37.2 rehearsal build through load_build. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A rebuild on a newer engine rewrites every changed output's narrative, and judges' prompts render it, so each rewrite costs a verdict. --reuse-from keeps the earlier narrative when the value, cause, grounding (its engine's name aside), PolicyEngine variable and trace are byte-identical and the narrative does not name the earlier engine; the reused rows are listed beside the output. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…he old annotations On the upgraded references the judge flagged WI 064 state, regenerated by #9801: it applied a $500 Wisconsin capital loss limit. The 2025 Wisconsin Schedule WD limits a net capital loss to $3,000 ($1,500 married filing separately) or less, as policyengine-us does, so the reference stands. The spec's triage_adjudications now carries such decisions (affirmed references only, on re-opened cases, dated by a wave the release names, read only with an upgrade installed); adjudicate-exclusions appends each from its case's bound verdict after dropping the regenerated records' decisions, and the gate holds it exact. A dropped case's new entry is new, not a restatement. The upgrade's scope export puts release 20261006's references back but keeps the stage's annotations, which follow the new references, so it now checks the dashboard schema without requiring an annotation on every wrong answer; it is read only for modelStats. The judge provenance record describes the working stage that carries the upgrade. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
freeze_haiku55.py now freezes an upgraded stage as strictly as a plain one: it re-gates the installed build and the recorded drops, requires the export receipt to bind every retained build file, holds the staged, committed and manifest reference pins to the build (scenarios stay release 20261006's), takes the build's explanations, exclusion record and counts (69 records, 1,915 scored outputs on the 2.37.2 rehearsal), names exactly the manifest fields the last upgrade may change, counts exclusions by their recorded engines in the version text, and checks the adjudication record with the upgrade's new-exclusion and triage decisions. freeze_snapshot.py follows the sidecar's last engine_upgrade revision, not the first. A stage without an upgrade freezes byte for byte as before. Built on a Subfleet build lane (GPT-6.1 Sol); its final regression run was stopped under a disk alert and re-run here. The scope export keeps calling release_20261006.export_payload, now with require_failure_annotations=False. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…and tolerances, correct eight narratives From the GPT-6.1 Sol review of the upgrade machinery (findings 3-8; 1 and 2 were already fixed in the scope export and triage commits): - A fix module that loads a sibling (r01, r02 and r03's v2 modules) now pins it: the builder and the evidence record each sibling's bytes as committed at the base, and the driver re-derives them. The 2.37.2 evidence is re-run with them; its values are unchanged. - Non-finite engine, module, evidence and action values are refused. - The installer requires an approval for every scored move beyond $1, and holds each regeneration to its own tolerance (at most $1). - Narrative reuse checks the earlier narratives file is that build's (each changed row once, for the US, no error, at the build's value), and keeps a narrative naming the engine only when the engine is the same. - A narrative states its amount only as a dollar figure equal to the cent; a bare "2026" no longer passes for $0. - Eight narratives that misstated a figure or the mechanism behind the change are hand-corrected from the engine's own values (hand_corrected_narratives.json, with the reasons in its .md). Also re-pins the spec to #200's merged proposed_changes.json (each record now names decision d1022; CO 043's reading is reworded), names d994 on the two Louisiana records, and drops an unverified Idaho statute citation from the drafted approval basis. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The case's re-judged verdict, after its narrative was corrected, raises no flag, so the release records no triage decision; the design note keeps the earlier verdict's $500 capital-loss hypothesis and why the reference stands. The judge provenance record follows the re-judged stage. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The board row forces the answer tool, which leaves Claude's extended thinking off (the onboarding probe's forced-tool response carries no thinking block); the 2026-10-08 re-run with tool_choice: auto declares the tool and leaves it to the model. Its predictions (results/local/haiku55-stage/auto-run, model renamed claude-haiku-5.5-thinking) are committed as a deterministic gzip, and the by-variable and rescore scripts take it. Its scores, would-rank and by-variable asset are written by the rescore after the 47-model board is frozen. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…arsal Both are drafts: every bracketed value is the rehearsal's and becomes a fact a test recomputes from the frozen release; the note and paper proper replace them once the release on the fixed policyengine-us is frozen. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…pgrade's counts ruled_records gathers the records the 2026-10-06 rulings decided, from the exclusion record and from a later upgrade's regenerated_exclusions, and refuses one that names no ruling; the counts split them by ruling and by whether the upgrade regenerated them. Word forms of the last upgrade's counts use digits above ten. Tested on the real 2.37.2 rehearsal build (local) and the mock second upgrade, whose 2026-10-06 record now names its ruling. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…aced at T)" This reverts commit 41ba29f.
The release is built on the policyengine-us release that carries #10032, which reaches PyPI on 2026-10-10 UTC: the tag, snapshot date, upgrade wave day, note, judge-evidence file and the card and test names follow. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The engine check and the builder now run in one process under the venv's interpreter (ENGINE_RUNNER via run_on_engine), launched with -P and a fresh, empty bytecode-cache prefix: no script or working directory joins the import path, and no __pycache__ beside the sources is read, so every module compiles from the verified source. The check also refuses unrecorded importable files (sourceless bytecode, native extensions) and accepts sha384 and sha512 RECORD hashes. sweep_timing.py run runs the reference build the same way. Regressions run the real runner on MOCK installs: stale unchecked-hash bytecode that a plain interpreter executes, a package beside the builder script, an unrecorded native extension, each permitted hash algorithm, and a missing scratch parent. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…pre-T review round 5) The engine check refuses any symlink in the installed package: a linked directory hid its files from the scan and could shadow a recorded module, so installs must be copies (uv's default link modes). sweep_timing.py run refuses an existing receipt or an out-dir already holding computed.csv, and refuses after the run unless the builder wrote a new one; path arguments are resolved in the parent, which a new test showed mattered: the child runs in the repository root, so a relative --out-dir named another directory there. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
sweep_timing.py run now parses the builder's arguments with the builder's own flags (equals forms, abbreviations, last occurrence), refuses unknown ones, resolves every path and passes them on in one canonical form. The file it holds to freshness is the one the builder writes: --computed-csv when given, else <out-dir>/computed.csv. A test keeps the replica's flags equal to the builder's. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…anges The narrative writer's drafts were checked against each output's trace by an independent reviewer; these texts state the final engine's value and figures, and the notes give what each draft got wrong. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…r expenses The release's judge flagged the regenerated reference: California does not conform to the federal educator expense deduction (FTB Instructions for Schedule CA (540), Section C, line 11), and policyengine-us 2.38.6 still allows it in California AGI, so the reference is about $26.90 low. The output keeps its record (the build's actions list it under excluded_outputs_rechecked), and its corrected narrative comes out: the release installs 23 corrected narratives, not 24. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…ine-us 2.38.6 references Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…e 2.38.6 board Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…r defect An engine-defect record whose output later engine changes moved is judged fixed against the corrected value the audit's committed fix-module evidence gives, not only the record's own value: CA 005 and CT 120 federal income tax land on theirs, so the IRA phase-out they rest on is no longer counted unfixed. A record whose recorded defect is fixed but whose reference rests on a further defect the engine has (CA 099's California income tax) is its own kind: counted with the defects upstream has not fixed in the abstract and limitations, and said so in the paper. A landed record that names neither reason is refused. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The card's engine, October move and exclusion breakdown, the paper guide's counts, the app's engine constant and the release note's facts follow the frozen release; the note's match count is the lower median (half of the newly scored outputs are answered within $1 by at most one model). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Re-pins the rendered PDF and web files in the manifest and paperSnapshot, syncs the app's serving config with the frozen copy, and commits the sweep timing and publication-check record the card and paper cite. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The judge-verdict dating script built on the working tree's evidence, so a rehearsal pass's 2026-10-09 wave (release dashboard-data-20261009) survived into the T evidence beside the real 2026-10-10 wave. The script now keeps release 20261006's waves and rewrites this release's on every pass, with a regression test, and the evidence is regenerated from the T stage (only that wave's six lines change; the restatements file is byte-identical). Test pins move from the rehearsal to T: 70 adjudications (14 regenerated records' decisions dropped), 58 excluded outputs in 42 households, 1,926 scored per model, 659 parse failures (644 less four on the new exclusions plus 19 on the 14 restored outputs), 718 contract violations, 8,001/7,997/ 2,138 audit counts, GPT-6 Sol's 95.6% headline, and Fable 5.1's program rates (federal 67/84 after seven restored outputs and two removed). The restored-target mock tests now count the sidecar's own two fix-module targets beside the mocked ones, and the judge-day check for the 2026-10-06 wave is back to the 2026-10-08 and 2026-10-09 runs it reviewed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
… file Final review (20261010-032143-pb-haiku-final-review) and the PR's first CI run: - Blocker: test_reference_exclusions and test_snapshot_artifacts still held rehearsal counts. They now pin T's: 58 exclusions (42 unlisted input, 14 engine defect, 2 later law; 38/18/2 by engine), 8,001 annotated rows, 7,997 misses, 10,139 below full bounded score, 7,342 llm_error and 659 parse failures. CI also failed test_freeze_haiku55's rehearsal snapshot dates (now the spec's 2026-10-10) and its other-tag test, which the date roll had left naming the driver's own tag (it now derives the day after). - sweep_timing.py read st_birthtime directly, which Linux's stat lacks, so every timing test crashed on CI. birth_time() now refuses on such a platform rather than date the record by a modification time, and the tests use a labeled MOCK modification-time source there only (they create each dated file once). Checked under a simulated Linux stat locally. - Should-fix: the paper said the move returns all 18 fixed outputs to scoring. A new accessor, engine_upgrade_restored_split_sentence (a pure restored_split_sentence with a Hypothesis test), says 14 that earlier releases excluded return and the four ruled on 2026-10-06 while still scored stay scored; the table cell says the same. The 2026-10-06 paragraphs in the paper and card now say PolicyBench ruled to exclude ten. Paper re-rendered and re-pinned. - Nit: the build's final_actions.json is now committed byte for byte (the sidecar's actions_sha256 ef23b50e...), as the 2026-09-29 upgrade's is. Its note predates CA 099's move to the rechecks and says 19 and 16; the new README's erratum says so, and a test holds the arrays at 18 and 17 against the sidecar. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Final review, round 1 (Subfleet
The reviewer found these sound:
Round 2 ( |
|
Final review, round 2 (Subfleet Merged at 4e10d12 ( After the merge:
|
…cyengine-us 2.41.0 - scripts/freeze_musewonder.py wrote the snapshot, the annotations (462 verified wording amendments), the app pointer (payload sha 14a61510...), the version label and the serving configuration: 48 models, 1,936 scored outputs per model, 48 exclusions, 60 adjudications. - Date the judge verdicts the release's decisions name (docs/musewonder/judge_verdicts_20261013.json); release 20261010's two waves now carry its commit (5a8164a, #208). - Publication check: policyengine-us 2.41.1, PyPI's newest at 09:39 UTC, gives 2.41.0's value for all 1,984 outputs (verification/publication_check_2_41_1.csv). - Pin policyengine-us 2.41.0 in pyproject.toml and uv.lock. - Rescore the five sensitivity runs on the 48-model board. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Release
dashboard-data-20261010. Claude Haiku 5.5 joins the board (47 models), Max's rulings of 2026-10-06 apply (d1022, d994), and the references move from policyengine-us 2.15.17 to 2.38.6. That is the first PyPI release with #10027, #10031, #10032 and #10034 (wheel uploaded 2026-10-10 05:39:47Z, version commit e92f4c6b95). Board snapshot: "Snapshot 2026-10-10".Board
test_release_20261010_note_claims).tool_choice: autogets 89.239%, which would rank Fall back to Main when sensitivity slice is empty for the active country #10. The board row forces the answer tool, and a probe with that request returned no thinking block (sensitivity/claude-thinking-2026-08.md).What moves
reference_audit/2026-10-09-engine-upgrade/, sidecarregenerated_exclusionsreference_audit/2026-10-05-reference-adversary/(#200); ruled records indocs/haiku55/spec.jsonreference_audit/2026-10-05-louisiana/README.md;docs/haiku55/spec.jsonnew_exclusionschangedexcluded_outputs_recheckedreference_audit/2026-10-09-engine-upgrade/hand_corrected_narratives.{json,md}).Driver, gates, invariants
scripts/finish_haiku55.pyruns the release: pin-inputs, prepare, install-exclusions, install-references, judge, adjudicate-exclusions, provenance, triage, export.scripts/freeze_haiku55.pyfreezes it. The references are built byreference_audit/2026-10-09-engine-upgrade/scripts/build_references_upgrade.py, run throughsweep_timing.py run. That wrapper checks the installed engine against its wheel RECORD in the computing process, with a fresh bytecode cache. It refuses symlinks, unrecorded importables and editable installs, and it requires fresh outputs. Six pre-T review rounds (GPT-6.1 Sol) covered this machinery.Invariants (tests):
test_build_references_upgrade.py, Hypothesis.)test_finish_haiku55.py, Hypothesis.)test_freeze_haiku55.py, Hypothesis.)verification/sweep_timing.json: 2.38.6 was the newest release when the sweep began (first output 05:45:24Z) and still the newest at 06:53:19Z. (test_sweep_timing.py.)tests/test_notes.py.)Asset
Uploaded as non-latest before CI: https://github.com/PolicyEngine/policybench/releases/tag/dashboard-data-20261010
dashboard-data.json: 128,756,688 B, sha256f834478e65191f8426ef479506f9f6fe32c2e7107f30fdbf4e7ba0e6acba6410. GitHub's asset digest matches, and so doesapp/src/data.artifact.json.predictions.csv.gz: 43,680,233 B, sha2560183ab75…, byte-identical to the frozen snapshot copy. GitHub's digest matches.Validation
--rendered-only.bun test tests171/171,bun run lintexit 0.uv run ruff check .andruff format --check .pass.test_notes,test_paper_results,test_disclosures,test_adjudications): 151 passed, 2 skipped. The full suite runs in this PR's CI; the local run is held because free disk is under the fleet's floor.20261010-032143-pb-haiku-final-review(GPT-6.1 Sol, hard tier). Its verdict will be posted here.After merge:
gh release edit dashboard-data-20261010 --latest, then a prod check on policybench.org (47 models, Claude Haiku 5.5 at 79.6%, Snapshot 2026-10-10). Max posts the social drafts.🤖 Generated with Claude Code