Skip to content

Add security focus to grant applications - #911

Draft
dergigi wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
feat/security-grant-category
Draft

Add security focus to grant applications#911
dergigi wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
feat/security-grant-category

Conversation

@dergigi

@dergigi dergigi commented Aug 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Adds a Security option to the regular grant application main focus dropdown so FOSS developers can submit work around security disclosure evaluation, hardening, regression tests, and related verification costs through the normal grant flow.

  • routes Security applications through the default applications repo with a security label
  • extracts application repo and label routing into a small tested helper
  • updates the downloadable grant application template

Build preview:

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
os-website Ready Ready Preview Aug 8, 2026 3:27pm

Request Review

<option value="">(Choose One)</option>
<option value="core">Bitcoin Core</option>
<option value="education">Education</option>
<option value="security">Security</option>

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit, this list appears to be in alphabetical order. If that was the intent, the new entry breaks that.

@Arvin21M

Arvin21M commented Aug 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
  • Ran test app and it worked fine from user perspective.
  • Application came through fine on back end.
  • Confirmation email to grantee came through fine.
  • Did not see a Cloudflare checkbox for anti-spam on this flow.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants