Skip to content

docs: reconcile references to the landed promotion-seam contract - #70

Merged
BunsDev merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/reconcile-seam-contract-landing
Sep 16, 2026
Merged

BunsDev merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/reconcile-seam-contract-landing

Conversation

@BunsDev

@BunsDev BunsDev commented Sep 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Follow-up to #25. Merging that PR made four references stale in the same pass
that created them: they call the seam contract a draft, and none carried the
channel-authority decision the merge settled.

  • docs/phases.md (two places), docs/strategy.md, docs/channels-and-strands.md
    now say the contract landed and that effective-channel determination sits with
    the daemon.
  • The Channel::Deliberate housekeeping note keeps its warning against undated
    symbol-snapshot claims and now dates the claim it makes: as of 2026-09-16
    no submission path constructs Channel::Deliberate, while the census
    classifier does read a stored "deliberate" value out of existing audit
    history.

That last distinction is precisely what the 2026-08-09 threads-xpo record got
wrong by asserting the symbol was referenced nowhere in coven.

No normative contract, required pin, or protected path changes.

Verified: agent-check.sh fast and full both exit 0.

Refs: threads-ot6, threads-xpo

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Merging #25 made four references stale in the same pass that created them.
They described the seam contract as a draft, which is no longer true, and none
of them carried the channel-authority decision the merge settled.

phases.md, strategy.md, and channels-and-strands.md now say the contract landed
and that effective-channel determination sits with the daemon.

The Channel::Deliberate housekeeping note also keeps its warning against
undated symbol-snapshot claims, and now dates the claim it makes: as of
2026-09-16 no submission path constructs Channel::Deliberate, while the census
classifier does read a stored "deliberate" value out of existing audit history.
That distinction is what the 2026-08-09 threads-xpo record got wrong by
asserting the symbol was referenced nowhere.

No normative contract, pin, or protected path changes.

Refs: threads-ot6, threads-xpo

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@BunsDev
BunsDev merged commit 4794f5e into main Sep 16, 2026
7 checks passed
@BunsDev
BunsDev deleted the docs/reconcile-seam-contract-landing branch September 17, 2026 11:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant