Skip to content

docs: update ChatEval links after move to thunlp #168

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
zh-hanlabs wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

docs: update ChatEval links after move to thunlp #168

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions README.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -138,8 +138,8 @@ python agentverse_command/main_simulation_gui.py --task simulation/db_diag

https://github.com/OpenBMB/AgentVerse/assets/11704492/c633419d-afbb-47d4-bb12-6bb512e7af3a

#### [Text Evaluation (ChatEval)](https://github.com/chanchimin/ChatEval)
In the context of the text evaluation scenario, we recommend users explore the [ChatEval](https://github.com/chanchimin/ChatEval) repo. They've implemented a multi-agent referee team on AgentVerse to assess the quality of text generated by different models. When given two distinct pieces of text, roles within ChatEval can autonomously debate the nuances and disparities, drawing upon their assigned personas, and subsequently provide their judgments. Experiments indicate that their referee team, enriched with diverse roles specified in [config.yaml](#2-configuring-the-agents), aligns more closely with human evaluations. This demo is built upon the [Fastchat](https://github.com/lm-sys/FastChat) repo, and we'd like to express our appreciation for their foundational work.
#### [Text Evaluation (ChatEval)](https://github.com/thunlp/ChatEval)
In the context of the text evaluation scenario, we recommend users explore the [ChatEval](https://github.com/thunlp/ChatEval) repo. They've implemented a multi-agent referee team on AgentVerse to assess the quality of text generated by different models. When given two distinct pieces of text, roles within ChatEval can autonomously debate the nuances and disparities, drawing upon their assigned personas, and subsequently provide their judgments. Experiments indicate that their referee team, enriched with diverse roles specified in [config.yaml](#2-configuring-the-agents), aligns more closely with human evaluations. This demo is built upon the [Fastchat](https://github.com/lm-sys/FastChat) repo, and we'd like to express our appreciation for their foundational work.


https://github.com/OpenBMB/AgentVerse/assets/75533759/58f33468-f15b-4bac-ae01-8d0780019f85
Expand Down