feat: support Pro2 host asset packages - #900
Conversation
|
@codex review |
|
@codex security review |
|
@cursoragent review |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for security reviews. Please try again later. |
|
Reviewed PR #900 ( What looks solid: unlock policy, Proven issues
Residual risk: host OKPP omits official RESC No code changes in this pass. I can turn the proven items into a follow-up patch if you want that. |
Review scope
This is a read-only review. Findings below are split into proven issues and hypotheses. What looks correct
Proven findings1. Package-format gate is weaker than its own unit test
getCurrentFirmwareVersionString() {
return parseDeviceVersion(this.state?.versions.firmware).join('.');
}
2. NFT public paths no longer match the file that was writtenOn firmware
The new test locks this in. Callers that persist those paths for later read/delete/display will miss the uploaded object unless firmware unpacks the archive to those exact names.
3. Host-side NFT cap is removed on the new path
The published contract in
4. Wallpaper
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: df728888c1
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
df72888 to
67b4950
Compare


Summary
Validation