[RFC 0169] Feature parameter names - #169
Draft
KAction wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
Loading
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
15 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
RFC to establish rules on how
enable/with/support/useflags should be named. Essentially, an attempt to bring order and uniformity of Gentoo USE flags into Nixpkgs.Pre-RFC discussion on the discourse
Rendered RFC