Skip to content

Adding Support for Literal types - #89

Open
Dakantz wants to merge 3 commits into
Maximilian-Winter:masterfrom
Dakantz:add-literal-support
Open

Dakantz wants to merge 3 commits into
Maximilian-Winter:masterfrom
Dakantz:add-literal-support

Conversation

@Dakantz

@Dakantz Dakantz commented Apr 1, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I have added the support as a a simple rule extension, currently tested for

  • str
  • enum
  • int
    literals.
from llama_cpp_agent.gbnf_grammar_generator.gbnf_grammar_from_pydantic_models import (
    generate_gbnf_grammar_from_pydantic_models,
)
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field
from typing import List, Optional, Dict, Any, Literal
from enum import Enum

class TestEnum(str, Enum):
    TEST = "test"
    TARGET = "target"
class TestType(BaseModel):
    type: Literal["test"]
    name: str


class TargetType(BaseModel):
    type: Literal["target"]
    other: str


class CombinerType(BaseModel):
    combined_type: list[TestType | TargetType]
    enum_literal: Literal[TestEnum.TEST]
    int_literal: Literal[1,5]

grammar = generate_gbnf_grammar_from_pydantic_models(
    [CombinerType],
)
print(grammar)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant