Skip to content

ci: label the staging spec-sheet step by what it runs - #38686

Closed
ggevay wants to merge 1 commit into
MaterializeInc:mainfrom
ggevay:gabor/spec-sheet-staging-label
Closed

ci: label the staging spec-sheet step by what it runs#38686
ggevay wants to merge 1 commit into
MaterializeInc:mainfrom
ggevay:gabor/spec-sheet-staging-label

Conversation

@ggevay

@ggevay ggevay commented Sep 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Motivation

The three spec-sheet steps were labeled inconsistently. The two production steps read "what runs (against where)", while the staging step said only where it runs.

Description

  • The staging step is now labeled Cluster spec sheet: envd Scalability + Cluster Object Count Limits (against Staging). It runs the envd_qps_scalability, envd_objects_scalability, and cluster_object_limits scenario groups. "Object count" is spelled out so the limit is not mistaken for a size limit.
  • The Cluster spec sheet prefix stays. It is what the mzcompose plugin's services.log check matches on.
  • Side effect: Buildkite Test Analytics starts a new suite history under the new name.

Independent of #38681, which touches other files.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The two production steps read "<what runs> (against <where>)", while the
staging step said only where it runs. It runs the envd QPS and envd
objects scalability groups and the cluster object limits group, so its
label now follows the same pattern, with "object count" spelled out so
the limit is not mistaken for a size limit. The "Cluster spec sheet"
prefix stays, which is what the mzcompose plugin's services.log check
matches on.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@ggevay

ggevay commented Sep 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Folded into #38681 as its last commit.

@ggevay ggevay closed this Sep 6, 2026
@ggevay
ggevay deleted the gabor/spec-sheet-staging-label branch September 6, 2026 10:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant