docs: fix update libstk0-dev to libstk-dev for debian/ubuntu

[NewBieCoderXD]

Aimed at issue #8408

I have changes on wiki submodule, but it seems like github doesn't support PR for submodule

This PR specifies similar dependency of libstk0-dev
Feel free to close this PR if you think the change is trivial.

For wiki changes, see my commit.

[JohannesLorenz]

Thank you for the suggestion!

However, I am not sure about how this improves it. Did the old message confuse you a lot? "Similar" usually means: It could be libstk0-dev, but also libstk1-dev or libstk-dev. With the suggested change, it means: libstk0-dev or libstk-dev (but not libstk1-dev).

Also, there are a lot of similar places, e.g. for portaudio.

[NewBieCoderXD]

Thank you for the suggestion!

However, I am not sure about how this improves it. Did the old message confuse you a lot? "Similar" usually means: It could be libstk0-dev, but also libstk1-dev or libstk-dev. With the suggested change, it means: libstk0-dev or libstk-dev (but not libstk1-dev).

Also, there are a lot of similar places, e.g. for portaudio.

Hey, thank you for your feedback.

You're right. I just realized this change makes it confusing. I'm sorry for the mistake.
How do you feel about changing it to "libstk-dev (or similar)"? (Remove the 0)

I totally understand if you think the change in this PR is very trivial and unnecessary. However, I strongly recommend updating wiki following this commit. (It's not in PR because I'm not sure how to open PR for submodule)

Edit: Oh, wait. You already updated the wiki. Thank you so much! This might be fastest PR ever. Feel free to close this PR if you think the change is unnecessary. :)

[JohannesLorenz]

How do you feel about changing it to "libstk-dev (or similar)"? (Remove the 0)

What about "libstk-dev or libstk0-dev (or similar)" ?

I totally understand if you think the change in this PR is very trivial and unnecessary.

No worries.

However, I strongly recommend updating wiki following this commit. (It's not in PR because I'm not sure how to open PR for submodule)

Edit: Oh, wait. You already updated the wiki. Thank you so much! This might be fastest PR ever. Feel free to close this PR if you think the change is unnecessary. :)

Where do you see that the LMMS wiki has been updated? Can you give a link, please?

[NewBieCoderXD]

Where do you see that the LMMS wiki has been updated? Can you give a link, please?

I kinda messed up here. I cloned the project, and I didn't realized it came with an outdated version of wiki submodule since that's the wiki commit the latest main repo commit points to. The wiki has already been updated a year ago. I'm sorry for not checking it thoroughly. (I'm not quite familiar with git submodule)

Links: https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/wiki/dependencies-debian, https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/wiki/dependencies-ubuntu

What about "libstk-dev or libstk0-dev (or similar)" ?

Sounds nice! I'll update it right away

[JohannesLorenz]

OK, I understand what you mean about the wiki. So, in other words, there is no need to update the wiki, correct?

However, the current state of the doc/wiki submodule is 2022. That also explains that you didn't see it. Maybe, do you want to include an update of it in this PR?

[NewBieCoderXD]

OK, I understand what you mean about the wiki. So, in other words, there is no need to update the wiki, correct?

Correct.

However, the current state of the doc/wiki submodule is 2022. That also explains that you didn't see it. Maybe, do you want to include an update of it in this PR?

Yes please! I would greatly appreciate that.

[JohannesLorenz]

You can do it in this PR - technically. I will ask some other LMMS devs if they are OK with it and will try to get back to you in the next days.