You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Suggestion to modify the definition of structural damping #192
damping_aniso_v2 - Rayleigh stiffness-proportional damping applicable to the FPM beam element. 3 parameters (because the first 3 are related to the mass and should be set to 0).
In my opinion, the definition of the structural damping in WindIO should be changed to the structural damping ratios for the clamped body in the undeflected configuration. This way, each software can tune its coefficient to match the target (measured) damping ratio. A couple of obvious questions are:
How many modes?
In which order?
We cannot expect that each software will model the same modes, nor that the eigen-solver will provide them in the same order. Therefore, a possible input could be:
This way, a software can model the first m low-frequency modes (m <= n), and the analyst can verify that each damping is applied to the expected mode. The first modes are always: flap 1, edge 1, flap 2, edge 2, while for higher-order modes a generic "mode_n" can be used.
I like your suggestion @RRiva here and in issue #193.
Do you have the bandwidths to submit one or more PRs? If not I can look for the time to work on them myself
Activity
ptrbortolotti commentedon Jul 10, 2026
I like your suggestion @RRiva here and in issue #193.
Do you have the bandwidths to submit one or more PRs? If not I can look for the time to work on them myself
RRiva commentedon Jul 13, 2026
Thanks Pietro 🙂 I'll start with a PR on the damping and later I'll submit one for the inertia.
RRiva commentedon Sep 24, 2026
The PR was merged 🙂