Skip to content

Add OKF summary policy receipt fixtures - #99

Closed
caioribeiroclw-pixel wants to merge 1 commit into
GoogleCloudPlatform:mainfrom
caioribeiroclw-pixel:caio/okf-summary-policy-fixtures
Closed

Add OKF summary policy receipt fixtures#99
caioribeiroclw-pixel wants to merge 1 commit into
GoogleCloudPlatform:mainfrom
caioribeiroclw-pixel:caio/okf-summary-policy-fixtures

Conversation

@caioribeiroclw-pixel

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • add tiny OKF summary-policy consumer-receipt fixtures for semantic inversion, entity substitution, and provenance erasure
  • each case has concept.md, good-summary.md, bad-summary.md, and expected.yaml
  • keep the fixture contract consumer-agnostic: it checks preservation against declared summary_policy, not truth in the world

Context

This follows the discussion in #53 about pairing source-side summary_policy with consumer-side receipts/conformance fixtures.

Validation

  • parsed all expected.yaml files with Python/YAML
  • checked each concept.md has OKF frontmatter and summary_policy
  • git diff --check

Note: I could not run the full OKF pytest suite in this environment because pytest is not installed.

@google-cla

google-cla Bot commented Jun 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

@caioribeiroclw-pixel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Closing this synthetic fixture PR as superseded by #208, which preserves the four-file contract and replaces the constructed cases with publicly sourced observed cases. #208 is still unreviewed and its CLA check is not yet green, so this closure avoids competing variants; it does not imply maintainer acceptance or merge readiness.

leesharks000 added a commit to leesharks000/knowledge-catalog that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2026
Three observed-case conformance fixtures per the four-file contract
agreed on GoogleCloudPlatform#53 (concept.md / good-summary.md / bad-summary.md /
expected.yaml), with stable assertion/compression IDs declared in
concept.md and referenced by expected.yaml. Each case is mapped from a
documented public observation of machine summarization, cited by
identifier and canonical URL with its observation boundary stated.

Supersedes the synthetic fixtures of GoogleCloudPlatform#99 at the request of
@caioribeiroclw-pixel.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant