You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 13, 2026. It is now read-only.
Repository navigation
This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 13, 2026. It is now read-only.
@NingYuanxiang I then doubled MAX_ITER as I cut IMS_PER_BATCH by half. The results is 0.4710, which is still much lower than provided results 49.5. I'll take a look at STEPS.
After seeing your issue, I conducted more experiments to provide some reference results, hoping it can help.
First of all, in order to achieve the results reported in the paper, we need to infer at 480p resolution according to the description in Table 3, so please set 'MIN_SIZE_TEST' to 480.
Directly reducing batchsize will result in insufficient usage of the dataset, so I have made three settings for IMS_PER_BATCH and MAX_ITER, and each setting is repeated five times.
The settings and results are as follows:
So, the reported results can be stably reproduced by default setting.
If you reduce the batchsize from 32 to 16, you may need to adjust the number of iterations appropriately.
Welcome to continue exploring the impact of different settings on training results and discuss here.
Activity
NingYuanxiang commentedon Jul 22, 2022
跑的这么快,几张卡啊大哥。STEPS、 MAX_ITER增大了吗?
HanGuangXin commentedon Jul 23, 2022
@NingYuanxiang I then doubled
MAX_ITERas I cutIMS_PER_BATCHby half. The results is 0.4710, which is still much lower than provided results 49.5. I'll take a look atSTEPS.wjf5203 commentedon Jul 23, 2022
Thanks for your attention!
After seeing your issue, I conducted more experiments to provide some reference results, hoping it can help.
First of all, in order to achieve the results reported in the paper, we need to infer at 480p resolution according to the description in Table 3, so please set 'MIN_SIZE_TEST' to 480.
Directly reducing batchsize will result in insufficient usage of the dataset, so I have made three settings for IMS_PER_BATCH and MAX_ITER, and each setting is repeated five times.
The settings and results are as follows:
Original:
IMS_PER_BATCH: 32
STEPS: (8000,)
MAX_ITER: 12000
Results (mAP): [50.5, 49.4, 49.8, 49.7, 48.8 ]
Setting1:
IMS_PER_BATCH: 16
STEPS: (8000,)
MAX_ITER: 12000
Results (mAP): [ 47.5, 47.1, 47.9, 47.4, 48.1]
Setting2:
IMS_PER_BATCH: 16
STEPS: (16000,)
MAX_ITER: 24000
Results (mAP): [49.0, 47.9, 48.5, 49.1, 48.6]
So, the reported results can be stably reproduced by default setting.
If you reduce the batchsize from 32 to 16, you may need to adjust the number of iterations appropriately.
Welcome to continue exploring the impact of different settings on training results and discuss here.