Fix SWE-Milestone paper listing (was incorrectly titled EvoClaw)

[autogame-17]

What does this PR do?

Correct the arXiv 2603.13428 listing. The live paper title is SWE-Milestone: Evaluating AI Agents on Continuous Software Evolution, not EvoClaw. The previous GitHub URL FSoft-AI4Code/EvoClaw is a confirmed 404; this PR replaces it with the official benchmark repo published in the paper HTML.

Papers live in README (not data/projects.json). Only these two rows changed.

Before

• Papers: [EvoClaw: Evaluating AI Agents on Continuous Software Evolution](https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.13428) (arXiv'26) - Benchmark revealing performance drops from >80% to at most 38% in continuous evolution settings.
• Benchmarks: [EvoClaw](https://github.com/FSoft-AI4Code/EvoClaw) (arXiv'26) - Evaluating agents on continuous software evolution.

After

• Papers: [SWE-Milestone: Evaluating AI Agents on Continuous Software Evolution](https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.13428) (ICML'26) - Benchmark revealing performance drops from >80% on isolated tasks to 38.03% in continuous evolution settings.
• Benchmarks: [SWE-Milestone](https://github.com/DeepCommit-ai/SWE-Milestone) (ICML'26) - Evaluating agents on continuous software evolution.

Evidence (checked live, not inferred)

• arXiv abs title: SWE-Milestone. Comments: ICML 2026. Abstract: scores drop from >80% on isolated tasks to 38.03% in continuous settings. No EvoClaw name and no code URL on the abs page.
• Paper HTML (v4) publishes official links: Benchmark github.com/DeepCommit-ai/SWE-Milestone, pipeline github.com/DeepCommit-ai/DeepCommit.
• gh api repos/FSoft-AI4Code/EvoClaw → HTTP 404. gh api repos/DeepCommit-ai/SWE-Milestone → public MIT repo, description [ICML 2026] Evaluating AI Agents on Continuous Software Evolution, homepage https://swe-milestone.com. EvoClaw-Bench/EvoClaw 301-redirects to that same repo (rename), and was not substituted as the listed URL.
• Unrelated GitHub hits (slhleosun/EvoClaw, clawinfra/evoclaw, etc.) were not used.

Checklist

• Project added to data/projects.json with correct schema — N/A: paper/benchmark rows are hand-maintained in README
• node scripts/generate-readme.js was run and README.md is up to date (idempotent; AUTOGEN sections unchanged)
• node scripts/validate.js passes (Validated 119 projects across 10 categories / Validation passed.)
• Project meets inclusion criteria (open source, active, documented, 50+ stars or a documented novelty exception) — N/A for paper-row correction; official code repo is public MIT
• Category and cross-list scope are correct; any duplicate listing is justified
• Description is concise, objective, starts with a capital letter, and ends with punctuation
• Links, paper, license, and factual claims were checked against primary sources
• No duplicate entries
• git diff --check is clean
• node scripts/check-links.js not applicable (script only checks data/projects.json, which this PR does not change)

Category

• Research Paper

🤖 Generated with Claude Code