[DrunkOnJava]

Summary

README.md and STATUS.md quote "921 tests" from 2026-10-27, a count that included the inline #[cfg(test)] suites no job runs since #428, and STATUS.md lists the integration tests by count (including two unit-classed files and a WASM count from a crate whose tests no CI job runs). A unit-suite pass count is not evidence.

• tests/fixtures/canonical/README.md: names the Test job's step, which is no longer cargo test, and says the byte-built R14 fixtures it cited are unit tests no job runs.
• README.md: the "What works today" sentence points at the Corpus job instead of a count; the Verification block shows tools/ci/run_test_targets.sh --release --all-features; the contributor checklist names the runner and says unit tests are banned.
• STATUS.md: the Tests, WASM tests and Integration tests bullets become one that names what CI runs, with no count. The generated coverage lines are untouched (python3 tools/maintainer/readme_status.py --check passes).

Lands after #428 (the runner it names) and after the area deletions (#429 to #434). Held back from #428 because open PRs touch these two files.

Spec reference

Not a decoder change.

Test plan

• python3 tools/maintainer/readme_status.py --check passes.
• CI evidence, run 40676560553, all 24 checks green (docs only; the generated README and STATUS blocks are unchanged).

Source-provenance declaration

By submitting this PR I certify that my contribution does not incorporate executable code from any source whose license is incompatible with Apache-2.0. Specifically:

• No Autodesk DWG SDK source (RealDWG, ObjectARX, ObjectDBX) or NDA-protected Autodesk documentation was consulted or imported.
• No Open Design Alliance Teigha / Drawings SDK source was consulted or imported. The ODA's public Open Design Specification for .dwg files PDF is explicitly allowed (see CLEANROOM.md).
• No GPL-licensed DWG implementation source (LibreDWG, etc.) was consulted or imported. This matters because dwg-rs is Apache-2.0 and must remain compatible.

My contribution is based on:

• The ODA's freely-redistributable Open Design Specification for .dwg files (v5.4.1);
• Public reverse-engineering notes, research papers, or blog posts cited inline;
• Reading algorithm-description comments (not executable code) in permissively-licensed projects (MIT / Apache / BSD) to resolve spec ambiguities: none were read for this change.

See CLEANROOM.md for the full allowed/forbidden source list and the honest scope of what "clean-room" means for this project.

Developer Certificate of Origin

By submitting this PR, I certify that the contribution complies with the Developer Certificate of Origin 1.1. Specifically, I affirm that the contribution is my own work (or rightfully licensed to me) and that it can be distributed under the project's Apache-2.0 license.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-28T14:00:33.902857Z	e2ea791	New commits

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 55fc30933b

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".