Skip to content

FSR-1633 | added copilot exclusions#104

Open
LeeGordon83 wants to merge 3 commits into
developmentfrom
feature/FSR-1633-github-copilot-exclusions
Open

FSR-1633 | added copilot exclusions#104
LeeGordon83 wants to merge 3 commits into
developmentfrom
feature/FSR-1633-github-copilot-exclusions

Conversation

@LeeGordon83

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 17, 2026 14:08
@LeeGordon83 LeeGordon83 changed the title added copilot exclusions FSR-1633 | added copilot exclusions Jun 17, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

Scanned Files

None

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds a repository-level .copilotignore to prevent GitHub Copilot from indexing/suggesting content from selected non-source or low-signal files in this project.

Changes:

  • Introduced .copilotignore with repo-specific exclusions.
  • Excluded package-lock.json, config/cap.json (fixture), and docs/ (historical release notes) from Copilot indexing.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@pwadmore-ea pwadmore-ea left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think package-lock.json has been excluded in other Node.js repositories so I don't see why this repository should be an exception. I won't request changes formally but suggest that package-lock.json is excluded.

If in agreement I suggest @nikiwycherley approves the pull request following the change.

pwadmore-ea
pwadmore-ea previously approved these changes Jun 19, 2026
@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants