You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
PSF star selection: survey other surveys' methods (MU_MAX−MAG_AUTO, colour) #950
PSF stars are selected from the stellar locus in FWHM vs magnitude. Since #934 the box is the KDE peak ± 3σ̂. In poor seeing the locus broadens and the box widens with it: on two test exposures it kept 99% of locus stars instead of 96%, and non-stars in the box went from 1.7% to 2.7%. The star–galaxy separation has drawn criticism before, and #935 shows FWHM stops separating stars from galaxies beyond about 21 mag.
Survey how other surveys select PSF stars (Euclid, DES Y6, KiDS, HSC) and propose what to adopt. Two candidates came up at the telecon:
PSF stars are selected from the stellar locus in FWHM vs magnitude. Since #934 the box is the KDE peak ± 3σ̂. In poor seeing the locus broadens and the box widens with it: on two test exposures it kept 99% of locus stars instead of 96%, and non-stars in the box went from 1.7% to 2.7%. The star–galaxy separation has drawn criticism before, and #935 shows FWHM stops separating stars from galaxies beyond about 21 mag.
Survey how other surveys select PSF stars (Euclid, DES Y6, KiDS, HSC) and propose what to adopt. Two candidates came up at the telecon:
Related: #935 (faint limit), #840 (star-catalogue depth and flux-radius bias).
Claude Opus 5.5 on behalf of Cail. From the 3x2pt telecon, 6 Oct 2026.