benchmarks: add Julia comparison results - #567
Open
avinxshKD wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
Good evening @pradeeban, ptal when get chance. Ran three alternating Julia/Python runs on the same machine. The report uses the median results, also raw logs are attached for reference :D |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds week 9 part 2, results from the Julia backend and matched Julia/Python benchmarks.
Includes the test setup, measured results, observations, and limitations. Attaching raw run logs for reference.
concore-benchmark-evidence-20260803.zip
On this machine, Mmap and ZMQ handled about 7.47x and 18.05x the File backend rate. Julia/Python File round-trip rates were close.