Fix Office ID constant formatting

[Calvindd2f]

Summary

• correct the Office ID GUID constant formatting
• ensure the native source file ends with a trailing newline for cleaner CI tooling

Testing

• not run (not requested)

---

Codex Task

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @Calvindd2f, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on minor code quality improvements within the OfficeScrubC2R-Native.cs file. It addresses an incorrectly formatted GUID constant, ensuring its proper structure, and adds a missing trailing newline to the file, which is beneficial for maintaining consistent file formatting and compatibility with various CI/CD tools.

Highlights

• GUID Formatting: Corrected the OFFICE_ID constant in OfficeScrubC2R-Native.cs to properly format it as a GUID by adding a missing leading curly brace.
• File Formatting: Ensured OfficeScrubC2R-Native.cs ends with a trailing newline character, which improves compatibility with CI tooling.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request aims to fix formatting, and while adding a trailing newline is a good change, the modification to the OFFICE_ID constant unfortunately introduces a critical bug. The new format of the constant will cause the IsInScope check to fail for most Office product codes, which would likely break the core functionality of the tool. I've provided a comment with a suggested fix to revert the change.