Repository navigation
S9 repo hygiene: fix the ownership map, codebase map and runbook; queue six ledger tick-offs - #3826
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…(ARCH-01); close #MAAXAX The organisation map put the Answer spending guard, the patient-detail detector, ingress safety, upload admission, the shared ingestion Edge Function modules and their tests in delivery, data-platform, personal-practice, clinical-content or nowhere. Edit hints and reviewer routing therefore pointed at the wrong owners. Move the clear misses the 20 Oct architecture audit listed into answer-engine and source-intake. Left as they are: scripts/promote-public-documents-batch.ts (publication step, keeps clinical-content review) and src/app/api/clinical-quality (stays with its dashboard in prototypes). Also queue the #MAAXAX done request (PR #3759 live-drift run 39740811325 passed) and a P3 row for its leftover clean-ups. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0147L1V42JqffXE1wew8zymM
…ck migration live in the re-index runbook Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0147L1V42JqffXE1wew8zymM
The #9Z197J update carries the pending 24 Oct update's text, which is cancelled so the two do not collide at reconcile. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0147L1V42JqffXE1wew8zymM
Contributor
|
Warning Review limit reachedYour organization has reached its usage spending cap. Adjust your spending cap in the billing tab. Next included review available in 40 minutes. View limit details
Comment |
|
This pull request has been ignored for the connected project Preview Branches by Supabase. |
Contributor
BigSimmo
marked this pull request as ready for review
October 26, 2026 09:47
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
Contributor
|
Claude encountered an error after 2s —— View job I'll analyze this and get back to you. |
BigSimmo
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 26, 2026
Applies the queued requests on main, including the six S9 tick-offs from #3826, with one cancellation. Ledger 91 open rows after reconcile. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EsF939L1hy81VC4Rxg3hL1
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Requested by Josh · project thread
Summary
Stream S9 of the 26 Oct master plan: documentation, ownership map and ledger only. No app code, no database, no protected search files.
answer-engineandsource-intake. Deliberately left:scripts/promote-public-documents-batch.ts(publication step, keeps clinical-content review) andsrc/app/api/clinical-quality/route.ts(stays with its dashboard).docs/codebase-index.mdworker table now lists the four real modules it was missing (claim-scope,extraction-provenance,image-caption-cache,review-carry-forward). The invented modules from ARCH-02 were already gone.20261025170000"merges only after the owner's own yes". It merged in RAG and ingestion audit follow-up (24 Oct): remaining fixes, plus two database migrations for the owner's own merge #3790 and live-drift run 40276000072 passed, so the runbook now says it is live.#MAAXAXdone (PR Propose TGA PI and WA source links for 48 more high-risk medicines, signable as the live TGA search (#05WXHX) #3759, live-drift run 39740811325 green), plus a new P3 row for its leftover clean-ups.#2X90V6closed without changing the archived read-only record; the correct branch name is kept in the outcome.#WWTRM5update: item 4 is on main; the mojibake arrow needs a small ledger-tool change, because reconcile does not rewrite the preamble.#9Z197Jupdate with the WebKit triage below. It carries the pending 24 Oct update's text, which is cancelled so the two do not collide at reconcile.#1RVGZF,#MSJT12,#NM9S1V,#SQ2FG9,#YDENFM) already have done requests on main. All six leave the open list at the nextissues:reconcilerun (dry run: 25 requests, 1 cancellation, no conflicts).Areas touched: Knowledge and records, Source intake and indexing
RAG impact: no retrieval behaviour change. Only ownership-map JSON and docs changed.
WebKit red on main (#3099, #9Z197J)
Run 40282193144 (#3796 merge) failed one test in one of 23 Firefox/WebKit shards:
tests/ui-tools.spec.ts:1538"Services keeps its shortlist when the shared composer submits another query at 1280px" onmobile-pwa-standalone. After clearing the shortlist and typing "housing", Enter submitted "crisis". This is the race f8f5ff2 tried to settle on 21 Oct. Not fixed here: it may be a real Safari bug where the shared composer overwrites a newly typed query, so it should be fixed at the cause, not by loosening the test.Check-main results
All 82 rows marked "check main", "recheck" or "partly fixed" in the plan CSV were rechecked against
2d02dbeb7, read-only. Results with evidence are in the project fileplan/streams/S9-check-main-results.csv. Of the 92 rows there (82 plus the S9 items): 49 fixed, 17 partly fixed, 25 still open, 1 closed without change.Verification
npm run verify:pr-local: "completed: check:runtime, check:installed-lock-parity, format:changed, check:diff-integrity, sitemap:check, check:mockups, check:repo-awareness-snapshot, docs:check-index, docs:check-inventory, docs:check-scripts, docs:check-links, check:decisions, check:branch-review-ledger, check:outstanding-issues, check:ledger-write-discipline, check:clinical-hazard-controls. failed: (none)"vitest run tests/check-organisation.test.ts tests/organisation-*.test.ts: 16 files, 446 tests passed.npm run check:organisation -- --no-report: exit 0 (pass); spot-checked moved files resolve to the new areas.node scripts/ledger-inbox.mjs reconcile --dry-run: "Would reconcile 25 request(s) ... with 1 cancellation decision(s)."Risk and rollout
Clinical Governance Preflight
Not applicable: no ingestion, answer, retrieval, source or clinical-output behaviour changed.
Generated by Claude Code