[BigSimmo]

Summary

• Records the owner's 24 Oct 2026 decision that Answer safety hardening: source tier rule, superseded sources out of evidence, national guidance line, tests and ledger #3743 stays. Sources marked outdated (superseded) remain excluded from answer evidence. This settles the apparent conflict with the 21 Oct rejection of Leave superseded, withdrawn and expired guidelines out of search #3700.
• Records that the owner re-approved the three-document re-index pilot and its after canary on 24 Oct, with a combined hard cap of US$7. The pilot plan itself is unchanged.

Areas touched: Knowledge and records

Verification

• Checks run:
  • npm run check:decisions: "198 entries, 1 full records, 0 errors"
  • npm run check:instructions: "instruction-budget: pass"
  • docs:check-index, docs:check-inventory, docs:check-links, check:outstanding-issues and check:clinical-hazard-controls all passed. These are the docs checks verify:pr-local --dry-run selected.

Risk and rollout

• Risk: documentation only.
• Rollback: revert the commit.
• Provider or production effects: None

Clinical Governance Preflight

Evidence / not applicable / unresolved:

• Not applicable. No code, retrieval or source metadata changes. The filter it records has been live since Answer safety hardening: source tier rule, superseded sources out of evidence, national guidance line, tests and ledger #3743.

Notes

• The pilot has not run yet. It needs the three document IDs and the reindex presses from the owner.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[supabase]

This pull request has been ignored for the connected project sjrfecxgysukkwxsowpy because there are no changes detected in supabase directory. You can change this behaviour in Project Integrations Settings ↗︎.

---

Preview Branches by Supabase.
Learn more about Supabase Branching ↗︎.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

Your organization has reached its usage spending cap. Adjust your spending cap in the billing tab.

Next included review available in 4 minutes.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available. Your 84 included PR review attempts over the past 7 days set your current allowance at 1 review per hour.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

Run configuration

• Source mode: Auto
• Repository: BigSimmo/PsychSift
• Branch: claude/project-thread-8liwcc
• File: .coderabbit.yaml
• Commit: 1987008
• Layers: Repository YAML
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Team
• Run ID: e880b4c3-afe1-45a0-a50a-3d36f6427753

Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2837cff and 1987008.

Files selected for processing: 3

• data/repo-awareness-snapshot.json
• docs/decisions/2026-10-23-reindex-pilot-approved.md
• docs/decisions/2026-10-24-superseded-sources-stay-out-of-answers.md

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-24T16:43:24.374028Z	d083b02	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[claude]

Claude encountered an error after 2s —— View job

---

I'll analyze this and get back to you.

[gitar-bot]

Gitar is working

Verification

Rules No rules evaluated

Functional validation Not enabled

Set up

Auto-approval Not enabled

Set up

_Gitar