docs(zai): add Coding Plan endpoint and [1m] model-name caveat - #987
Open
adisivaprasad wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
docs(zai): add Coding Plan endpoint and [1m] model-name caveat#987adisivaprasad wants to merge 1 commit into
adisivaprasad wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Fixes BerriAI/litellm#32218
Proxy and SDK users following Z.AI's documentation send
zai/glm-5.2[1m]and getUnknown Modelback. The[1m]suffix is a client-side naming convention (tools like Claude Code strip it before calling the API); the Coding Plan endpoint only accepts the plain model name.This adds a
Z.AI Coding Plansection todocs/providers/zai.mdthat documents the dedicated endpoint (https://api.z.ai/api/coding/paas/v4) and the naming caveat, which is the second option the issue reporter explicitly listed as an acceptable resolution.