Implement ast checker strategy to enforece leading underscore for private and protected member variables/issue 131 by 97gamjak · Pull Request #132 · 97gamjak/devops

85.91% (+0.28%) compared to 615e154

85.91% (+0.28%) compared to 615e154

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 97.56098% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 85.91%. Comparing base (615e154) to head (9843167).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on dev.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...pp/ast/checks/enforce_member_leading_underscore.py	97.50%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev     #132      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   85.62%   85.91%   +0.28%     
==========================================
  Files          50       51       +1     
  Lines        1663     1704      +41     
==========================================
+ Hits         1424     1464      +40     
- Misses        239      240       +1

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Navigation Menu

Implement ast checker strategy to enforece leading underscore for private and protected member variables/issue 131 - #132

Implement ast checker strategy to enforece leading underscore for private and protected member variables/issue 131#132
97gamjak merged 3 commits into
devfrom
Implement-ast-checker-strategy-to-enforece-leading-underscore-for-private-and-protected-member-variables/issue-131

Uh oh!

85.91% (+0.28%) compared to 615e154

Details

Codecov Report

Re-running checks...

Implement ast checker strategy to enforece leading underscore for pri…

Uh oh!

85.91% (+0.28%) compared to 615e154

Details

Codecov Report

Re-running checks...