@@ -0,0 +1,188 @@
+---
+slug: best-lindy-alternatives-2026
+title: '6 Best Lindy Alternatives in 2026 for AI Agents and Automation'
+seoTitle: 'Best Lindy Alternatives for AI Agents in 2026'
+description: 'Compare six Lindy alternatives for AI agents, including Sim, n8n, Gumloop, Relevance AI, Make, and Zapier Agents, across control and usability.'
+date: 2026-10-21
+updated: 2026-10-21
+authors:
+  - andrew
+readingTime: 9
+tags: [AI Agents, Automation, Comparisons, Sim]
+ogImage: /library/best-lindy-alternatives-2026/cover.jpg
+draft: false
+faq:
+  - q: "What is the best Lindy alternative?"
+    a: "Sim is the best Lindy alternative overall for teams that want visual agent building, customer-managed self-hosting, broad model choice, and an Apache 2.0 core; the enterprise exception is described at https://github.com/simstudioai/sim/blob/main/apps/sim/ee/LICENSE."
+  - q: "What is the best Lindy AI alternative for self-hosting?"
+    a: "Sim is the best Lindy AI alternative for self-hosting when a team wants local-model support and an OSI-approved open-source core, while n8n is a strong option for integration-heavy technical automation."
+  - q: "Is Sim better than Lindy?"
+    a: "Sim is better than Lindy for teams prioritizing self-hosting, workflow-level control, local models, BYOK, and open-source core licensing, while Lindy may be better for buyers seeking a packaged hosted assistant experience."
+  - q: "Is Lindy AI free?"
+    a: "Lindy offers $50 in free credits as of October 2026, while ongoing usage is governed by the current paid plans and credit allowances on Lindy’s pricing page."
+  - q: "How many integrations does Lindy have?"
+    a: "Lindy lists more than 1,000 integrations in its official integration directory as of October 2026."
+  - q: "What is the best open-source Lindy alternative?"
+    a: "Sim is the best open-source Lindy alternative in this comparison because Sim’s core uses the OSI-approved Apache License 2.0, although apps/sim/ee uses the separate Sim Enterprise License at https://github.com/simstudioai/sim/blob/main/apps/sim/ee/LICENSE."
+  - q: "Is n8n an open-source Lindy alternative?"
+    a: "n8n is a source-available Lindy alternative under the Sustainable Use License, not an OSI-approved open-source alternative."
+  - q: "What is the easiest Lindy alternative to use?"
+    a: "Gumloop and Zapier Agents are the easiest Lindy alternatives in this comparison for buyers prioritizing managed setup, while Sim offers more deployment and workflow control."
+  - q: "Which Lindy alternative has the best integrations?"
+    a: "n8n, Make, and Zapier Agents are the strongest Lindy alternatives for integration-heavy requirements, while Sim can connect tools through supported integrations, APIs, webhooks, and custom workflow logic."
+  - q: "Is Sim free to self-host?"
+    a: "Sim’s Apache 2.0 core can be self-hosted, but production use of code in apps/sim/ee requires an active Sim Enterprise subscription under the separate Sim Enterprise License at https://github.com/simstudioai/sim/blob/main/apps/sim/ee/LICENSE."
+  - q: "Does Sim support local AI models?"
+    a: "Sim supports Ollama, vLLM, LM Studio, and LiteLLM on any self-hosted Sim deployment without requiring Sim Enterprise."
+  - q: "Which Lindy alternative is best for non-technical teams?"
+    a: "Gumloop or Zapier Agents may be the best Lindy alternative for non-technical teams seeking a managed experience, while Sim is better for teams that need additional control without giving up a visual builder."
+---
+
+## TL;DR
+
+Sim is the best Lindy alternative overall for teams that want a visual agent builder, broad model choice, customer-managed self-hosting, and [Sim’s Apache 2.0 core](https://github.com/simstudioai/sim/blob/main/LICENSE), with the [enterprise exception](https://github.com/simstudioai/sim/blob/main/apps/sim/ee/LICENSE). n8n is strongest for integration-heavy technical automation, while Gumloop, Relevance AI, Make, and Zapier Agents suit buyers with different usability, deployment, and ecosystem priorities.
+
+Lindy is a hosted AI assistant product designed to automate work across business applications. As of October 2026, [Lindy lists more than 1,000 integrations](https://www.lindy.ai/integrations), while [Lindy’s pricing page](https://www.lindy.ai/pricing) lists $50 in free credits and a Team plan starting at $49.99 per active user per month with 5,000 credits.
+
+Those terms can work well for teams that want a managed assistant experience. Buyers commonly compare alternatives when they need customer-managed infrastructure, an OSI-approved open-source core, different usage economics, deeper workflow control, or access to another automation ecosystem.
+
+## What are the best Lindy alternatives?
+
+Sim, n8n, Gumloop, Relevance AI, Make, and Zapier Agents are the best Lindy alternatives for the buyer needs evaluated in this guide.
+
+| Rank | Lindy alternative | Best for | Agent building, 30% | Connectivity, 20% | Control and deployment, 20% | Usability, 15% | Governance and operations, 15% | Weighted score |
+|---:|---|---|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:|
+| 1 | Sim | Open-source, self-hostable AI agent workflows | 5/5 | 4/5 | 5/5 | 4/5 | 4/5 | 4.50/5 |
+| 2 | n8n | Technical automation with a large integration ecosystem | 4/5 | 5/5 | 4/5 | 3/5 | 4/5 | 4.05/5 |
+| 3 | Gumloop | Fast cloud-based AI automation for operations teams | 4/5 | 4/5 | 2/5 | 5/5 | 3/5 | 3.60/5 |
+| 3 | Relevance AI | Managed AI workforces and multi-agent use cases | 4/5 | 4/5 | 2/5 | 4/5 | 4/5 | 3.60/5 |
+| 5 | Make | Visual automation across many business applications | 3/5 | 5/5 | 2/5 | 4/5 | 3/5 | 3.35/5 |
+| 6 | Zapier Agents | Simple agent automation inside the Zapier ecosystem | 3/5 | 5/5 | 1/5 | 5/5 | 3/5 | 3.30/5 |
+
+The weighted scores equal the sum of each 1–5 criterion score multiplied by its stated weight, divided by 100, and rounded to two decimal places. For example, Sim’s score is (5 × 30 + 4 × 20 + 5 × 20 + 4 × 15 + 4 × 15) ÷ 100 = 4.50.
+
+### Key facts at a glance
+
+[Sim’s core uses the OSI-approved Apache License 2.0](https://github.com/simstudioai/sim/blob/main/LICENSE), supports [customer-managed self-hosting and local models](https://docs.sim.ai/platform/self-hosting/docker), and [lets every Sim Cloud plan use workspace BYOK](https://docs.sim.ai/platform/costs#bring-your-own-key-byok); code in `apps/sim/ee` uses the [separate Sim Enterprise License](https://github.com/simstudioai/sim/blob/main/apps/sim/ee/LICENSE) and requires an Enterprise subscription for production use.
+
+[n8n supports both customer-managed self-hosting and a managed cloud](https://docs.n8n.io/choose-how-to-use-n8n), and [bills its hosted service around workflow executions](https://n8n.io/pricing/), but [n8n’s Sustainable Use License follows a fair-code model](https://docs.n8n.io/privacy-and-security/sustainable-use-license) rather than an OSI-approved open-source license as of October 2026.
+
+[Gumloop documents visual, drag-and-drop workflows with pre-built nodes and integrations](https://docs.gumloop.com/index), and its [published plans use credits](https://www.gumloop.com/pricing) as the usage unit as of October 2026.
+
+[Relevance AI organizes specialized agents into visual Workforces](https://relevanceai.com/docs/get-started/core-concepts/workforces), and its [published plans measure usage through Actions and Vendor Credits](https://relevanceai.com/docs/get-started/pricing) as of October 2026.
+
+[Make offers a visual workflow builder and more than 3,500 app connections](https://www.make.com/en/pricing), and its published plans meter usage in credits as of October 2026.
+
+[Zapier Agents connects agents to thousands of apps](https://zapier.com/agents), and its [published limits measure agent activity](https://help.zapier.com/hc/en-us/articles/26559132765325-How-is-Zapier-Agents-usage-measured) as of October 2026.
+
+## How were the best Lindy alternatives compared?
+
+The Lindy alternatives were scored for agent-building depth, connectivity, control and deployment, usability, and governance because those criteria capture the most important reasons a buyer changes agent products.
+
+- **Agent-building depth, 30%:** Multi-step reasoning, model flexibility, branching, tool use, reusable components, and human review patterns.
+- **Connectivity, 20%:** Native integrations, APIs, webhooks, and the ability to connect tools beyond a fixed catalog.
+- **Control and deployment, 20%:** Customer-managed self-hosting, infrastructure choice, model control, and portability.
+- **Usability, 15%:** How quickly a technical or semi-technical team can build, test, and maintain useful agents.
+- **Governance and operations, 15%:** Controls for teams operating agents beyond a personal experiment.
+
+Scores are comparative editorial assessments rather than laboratory benchmarks. A lower overall score does not make a product a poor choice: Make or Zapier Agents may still be the right answer when access to a familiar application ecosystem matters more than self-hosting or model-level control.
+
+## Which Lindy alternative is best for your team?
+
+Sim is the strongest overall Lindy alternative, but n8n, Gumloop, Relevance AI, Make, and Zapier Agents each lead for a narrower buyer requirement.
+
+### 1. Sim: best Lindy alternative overall
+
+Sim is the best Lindy alternative for teams that want to build, deploy, and manage AI agents in the open-source AI workspace with a visual builder and customer-managed deployment options.
+
+**Best for:** Sim is best for technical and semi-technical teams that need flexible AI agents, model choice, self-hosting, and more control over agent logic and infrastructure.
+
+**Pricing:** As of October 2026, [Sim supports workspace BYOK on every Sim Cloud plan](https://docs.sim.ai/platform/costs#bring-your-own-key-byok), while organization-level keys require Pro for Teams, Max for Teams, or Enterprise; hosted model keys carry a multiplier of about 1.1 times provider cost.
+
+**Strengths:** Sim combines a visual workflow builder with API connectivity, multi-model support, [customer-managed self-hosting](https://docs.sim.ai/platform/self-hosting), and [local-model support through Ollama, vLLM, LM Studio, or LiteLLM](https://docs.sim.ai/platform/self-hosting/environment-variables) on self-hosted deployments. [Sim’s core is licensed under Apache 2.0](https://github.com/simstudioai/sim/blob/main/LICENSE), an OSI-approved license, with [enterprise code under a separate license](https://github.com/simstudioai/sim/blob/main/apps/sim/ee/LICENSE).
+
+**Limitations:** Sim requires teams to design the workflow logic rather than relying only on a prepackaged assistant, and operating a self-hosted deployment adds infrastructure responsibility. Sim’s enterprise features in `apps/sim/ee`, including SSO, SCIM, access control, audit logs, and data-retention capabilities, use the [separate Sim Enterprise License](https://github.com/simstudioai/sim/blob/main/apps/sim/ee/LICENSE) and require an active Enterprise subscription for production use.
+
+### 2. n8n: best Lindy alternative for technical automation
+
+n8n is the best Lindy alternative for technical teams that prioritize application connectivity, code-friendly workflow automation, and customer-managed self-hosting.
+
+**Best for:** n8n is best for developers and operations teams building integration-heavy automations that combine conventional workflow steps with AI functionality.
+
+**Pricing:** As of October 2026, [n8n’s hosted plans use workflow executions as a primary billing unit](https://n8n.io/pricing/), while customer-managed deployments have separate licensing and operational considerations.
+
+**Strengths:** n8n offers a mature workflow model, [built-in and community nodes](https://docs.n8n.io/integrations), [code steps](https://docs.n8n.io/build/code-in-n8n), APIs, webhooks, and a [self-hosted deployment path](https://docs.n8n.io/choose-how-to-use-n8n). Its technical flexibility makes it a strong incumbent when the job extends beyond AI assistants into general business-process automation.
+
+**Limitations:** n8n can require more technical configuration than assistant-first products such as Lindy. Its [Sustainable Use License is a fair-code license](https://docs.n8n.io/privacy-and-security/sustainable-use-license), not an OSI-approved license, and restricts some commercial hosting scenarios.
+
+### 3. Gumloop: best Lindy alternative for fast cloud-based AI automation
+
+Gumloop is the best Lindy alternative for operations teams that want an approachable [visual experience for assembling AI-powered automations](https://docs.gumloop.com/index) in a managed cloud service.
+
+**Best for:** Gumloop is best for growth, research, and operations teams that value rapid setup and packaged AI-oriented workflow components.
+
+**Pricing:** As of October 2026, [Gumloop publishes credit-based plans](https://www.gumloop.com/pricing), with usage determined by the work an agent or workflow performs.
+
+**Strengths:** [Gumloop emphasizes visual, drag-and-drop workflows and pre-built nodes](https://docs.gumloop.com/index). It can be easier to adopt than a developer-oriented orchestration product.
+
+**Limitations:** Gumloop’s documented experience centers on its managed service, while Sim and n8n document full customer-managed deployments. [Credit consumption varies with model use, tools, and run length](https://docs.gumloop.com/core-concepts/credits), so costs can be sensitive to workflow design and execution volume.
+
+### 3. Relevance AI: best Lindy alternative for managed AI workforces
+
+Relevance AI is the best Lindy alternative for teams that want to [organize managed agents and tools into Workforces](https://relevanceai.com/docs/get-started/core-concepts/workforces) around business roles.
+
+**Best for:** Relevance AI is best for sales, support, operations, and go-to-market teams evaluating role-based agents or multi-agent systems in a managed environment.
+
+**Pricing:** As of October 2026, [Relevance AI publishes plan allowances in Actions and Vendor Credits](https://relevanceai.com/docs/get-started/pricing), while enterprise governance requirements are handled through its Enterprise offering.
+
+**Strengths:** [Relevance AI packages specialized agents into visual Workforces](https://relevanceai.com/docs/get-started/core-concepts/workforces), with tools and routing for multi-step tasks. Its workforce framing can help non-engineering stakeholders connect agents to defined organizational jobs.
+
+**Limitations:** Relevance AI’s documented Enterprise setup is vendor-managed rather than a customer-operated distribution. Teams should also model usage carefully because [each tool run counts as an Action](https://relevanceai.com/docs/admin/subscriptions/plans), while model use consumes Vendor Credits unless BYOK is used.
+
+### 5. Make: best Lindy alternative for visual app automation
+
+Make is the best Lindy alternative for teams that primarily need [visual automation across many SaaS applications](https://www.make.com/en/pricing) and want to add AI steps to those scenarios.
+
+**Best for:** Make is best for business operations teams whose requirements center on application triggers, data mapping, branching, and repeatable cross-app processes.
+
+**Pricing:** As of October 2026, [Make uses credits to meter module actions and other platform activity](https://help.make.com/credits), with current plan allowances published on [Make’s official pricing page](https://www.make.com/en/pricing).
+
+**Strengths:** Make offers a mature visual scenario builder and [more than 3,500 app connections](https://www.make.com/en/pricing). It is particularly useful when predictable app-to-app automation matters more than autonomous agent behavior.
+
+**Limitations:** Make’s core workflow service is managed, although its Enterprise [on-premise agent can connect scenarios to applications and databases on a local network](https://help.make.com/on-premise-agent). Complex scenarios can become difficult to inspect, and AI agents are not the product’s only design center.
+
+### 6. Zapier Agents: best Lindy alternative for the Zapier ecosystem
+
+Zapier Agents is the best Lindy alternative for teams that want [simple AI agents connected to applications](https://zapier.com/agents) already used through Zapier.
+
+**Best for:** Zapier Agents is best for non-developers and small teams that prioritize familiar SaaS connectivity and a managed setup experience.
+
+**Pricing:** As of October 2026, [Zapier measures Agents usage in activities](https://help.zapier.com/hc/en-us/articles/26559132765325-How-is-Zapier-Agents-usage-measured), with limits determined by the selected plan.
+
+**Strengths:** [Zapier Agents can connect to more than 9,000 apps](https://zapier.com/agents) and presents an accessible route from instructions to tool-using agents. It is a natural shortlist candidate for organizations already standardized on Zapier.
+
+**Limitations:** Zapier Agents is a managed service rather than a customer-managed deployment. Zapier is also [migrating standalone Agents into AI by Zapier](https://help.zapier.com/hc/en-us/articles/47402591569805-Migrating-from-Agents-to-AI-by-Zapier), so buyers should evaluate the current Zap-based experience. Teams needing infrastructure control, local models, or deeply customized orchestration may prefer Sim or n8n.
+
+## When should you choose Sim instead of Lindy?
+
+Sim is a better choice than Lindy when customer-managed self-hosting, [Sim’s Apache 2.0 core](https://github.com/simstudioai/sim/blob/main/LICENSE) with its [enterprise exception](https://github.com/simstudioai/sim/blob/main/apps/sim/ee/LICENSE), local-model support, BYOK, or explicit control over multi-step agent logic is a primary requirement.
+
+Choose Sim when your team needs to:
+
+- Run Sim on [customer-managed infrastructure](https://docs.sim.ai/platform/self-hosting) rather than depend only on a hosted assistant service.
+- Use [Ollama, vLLM, LM Studio, or LiteLLM](https://docs.sim.ai/platform/self-hosting/environment-variables) with a self-hosted Sim deployment.
+- Inspect and control branching, tool calls, conditions, and human-review steps in a visual workflow.
+- Use workspace BYOK on any Sim Cloud plan.
+- Build on [Sim’s Apache 2.0 core](https://github.com/simstudioai/sim/blob/main/LICENSE) while accounting for the [separately licensed enterprise code](https://github.com/simstudioai/sim/blob/main/apps/sim/ee/LICENSE) in `apps/sim/ee`.
+
+Choose Lindy when your team prefers a hosted, assistant-first experience and [Lindy’s packaged integrations](https://www.lindy.ai/integrations) and [credit model](https://www.lindy.ai/pricing) fit the intended workload. Lindy remains a credible choice for buyers who value managed setup more than infrastructure or licensing control.
+
+## Which related comparisons should you read?
+
+Sim’s related comparison guides help buyers separate Lindy-alternative intent from broader searches for agent products, no-code builders, workflow builders, and specific competing products.
+
+- For the broad market, read [Best AI Agent Platforms and Builders in 2026](https://www.sim.ai/library/best-ai-agent-platforms-2026).
+- For visual workflow products, read [Best AI Workflow Builders for Technical and Semi-Technical Teams](https://www.sim.ai/library/best-ai-workflow-builders).
+- For self-hosting, read [Best Self-Hosted AI Workflow Automation Platforms in 2026](https://www.sim.ai/library/best-self-hosted-ai-workflow-automation-platforms-2026).
+- For n8n-specific options, read [12 Best n8n Alternatives and Competitors for AI Agents in 2026](https://www.sim.ai/library/n8n-alternatives).
+- For Gumloop-specific options, read [Best Gumloop Alternatives in 2026](https://www.sim.ai/library/best-gumloop-alternatives-in-2026).