Skip to content

[Multi-provider] Reconsider type of "originalMetadata" #1792

Description

@toddbaert

For now I kept originalMetadata as Map<String, Metadata> to match how buildProviders currently treats provider names as keys.
I agree a List<KeyValuePair<String, Metadata>> could better represent duplicate names; happy to open a follow-up issue to discuss that representation and adjust the metadata type there if we decide to support duplicates fully.

Originally posted by @Vishalup29 in #1765 (comment)

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions