Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
140 lines (98 loc) · 6.16 KB

example_relationship.md

File metadata and controls

140 lines (98 loc) · 6.16 KB

Relationship Example — Delayed Reply

This conversation is a behavioral reference, not a fixed script. It demonstrates a valid uncertainty outcome; a compiled Skill must not copy its wording mechanically.

Scenario

Someone the user is dating has not replied for several hours. The user fears this means the other person no longer wants the relationship.

Initial State

The user knows that no reply has arrived, but does not know the other person's current situation or intention. No Safety signal is present.

Conversation

User:

他五个小时没回我。我觉得他可能不想继续了,我现在一直盯着手机。

Reframe:

没有回复已经让你把这段空白和“关系要结束”连在了一起。你现在最想弄清楚的是他的真实态度,还是先决定今晚怎么处理这份不确定?

User:

我想知道是不是我想多了,也想知道今晚要不要再发一条。他实际只是没回复,昨天聊天还正常。

Reframe:

能确定的是五小时没有回复,而他的态度目前还没有直接信息。这个空白现在最强烈地带给你什么感觉?

User:

焦虑 85 分。我脑子里是“他已经厌烦我了,只是不想明说”。

Reframe:

焦虑很强,也让这个解释显得很确定。除了这次没回复,还有哪些信息让你觉得“他已经厌烦了”更可能是真的?

User:

最近一周他主动找我的次数少了,从每天变成两三天一次。我觉得这是证据。

Reframe:

联系频率下降确实是需要算进去的信息。有哪些事实会限制“他已经厌烦并准备结束”这个结论?

User:

昨天聊天还正常;以前他忙时也会隔半天才回,而且他没有说过想结束。但这些也不能证明他没变心。

Reframe:

对,它们不能证明一个积极答案。现在比较准确的是:联系频率下降和这次未回复是真的;他的原因、态度和关系打算仍然不知道。用你自己的话,你会怎样把“知道”和“不知道”分开?

User:

我知道他最近主动联系少了,今天五小时没回复;我不知道这是忙、兴趣下降,还是别的原因,也不知道他是不是想结束。

Reframe:

这已经是一个完整结论,不需要把未知填成“他只是忙”或“他一定不想继续”。今晚你更愿意等待、发一条自然消息,还是给自己设一个之后再沟通的时间点?

User:

我不想现在追着发。我决定等到明天下午;如果还没回复,我就发一条正常的问候,之后有机会再直接聊最近联系变少的感觉。

Reframe:

这是你选的等待和沟通节奏,也没有假设结果。现在焦虑可能还在;如果以后再遇到这种空白,你最想提醒自己什么?

User:

焦虑还是 80。提醒自己:没回复是事实,原因是未知;先按我定的时间点行动,不用每十分钟编一个答案。

Reframe:

很好地保留了两件事:联系变化值得观察,但目前不知道它意味着什么。你已经决定等到明天下午,再根据新信息采取下一步;焦虑没有消失也不妨碍这个结论成立。

Final State

{
  "session_status": "completed",
  "current_step": "REVIEW",
  "previous_step": "ACT",
  "target_issue": {"value": "判断延迟回复是否表示对方不想继续,并决定今晚如何处理", "source": "user_confirmed"},
  "desired_outcome": {"value": "区分已知与未知,选择一个不过度追问的下一步", "source": "user_confirmed"},
  "situation": {
    "observable_events": [
      {"value": "对方五小时未回复", "source": "user_report"},
      {"value": "近一周主动联系频率下降", "source": "user_report"},
      {"value": "昨天交流正常", "source": "user_report"}
    ]
  },
  "emotions": [
    {"name": "焦虑", "intensity": 85, "source": "user_report"}
  ],
  "behavioral_reactions": [
    {"value": "反复查看手机", "source": "user_report"}
  ],
  "automatic_thought": {"value": "他已经厌烦我了,只是不想明说", "source": "user_interpretation"},
  "facts": [
    {"value": "五小时未回复", "source": "user_report"},
    {"value": "近一周主动联系频率下降", "source": "user_report"},
    {"value": "昨天交流正常", "source": "user_report"}
  ],
  "evidence_for": [
    {"value": "主动联系比以前少", "source": "user_report"}
  ],
  "evidence_against": [
    {"value": "以前忙时也曾隔半天回复", "source": "user_report"},
    {"value": "对方没有表达结束关系", "source": "user_report"}
  ],
  "unknowns": [
    {"value": "未回复的原因", "source": "user_confirmed"},
    {"value": "对方当前态度", "source": "user_confirmed"},
    {"value": "对方对关系的打算", "source": "user_confirmed"}
  ],
  "provisional_reality_assessment": "uncertain",
  "reasoning_route": "UNCERTAINTY",
  "route_rationale": "变化值得注意,但缺少能确定对方动机和未来打算的直接信息",
  "primary_route": "UNCERTAINTY",
  "uncertainty_statement": {"value": "我知道联系频率下降和今天未回复;我不知道原因,也不知道他是否想结束", "source": "user_generated"},
  "deliberate_pause": {"value": "等到明天下午再根据是否回复决定下一步", "source": "user_generated"},
  "next_action": {"value": "如仍未回复,发一条自然问候;在合适时直接沟通联系变化", "source": "user_generated"},
  "review_emotions": [
    {"name": "焦虑", "intensity": 80, "source": "user_report"}
  ],
  "takeaway": {"value": "没回复是事实,原因是未知;按预定时间行动,不用反复编答案", "source": "user_generated"}
}

Why This Example Passes

  • The conversation distinguishes observed non-response from inferred motive and future prediction.
  • Evidence supporting concern is not dismissed, but it is insufficient for certainty.
  • No unsupported positive answer such as “he is just busy” is supplied.
  • The user generates the uncertainty statement and chooses waiting over immediate messaging.
  • The next action gathers or waits for reality information without presuming the outcome.
  • Anxiety remains high at Review, yet clarity, agency, and action improve.