codeunit 9224 "Dynamics 2D QR-Code Encoder" -> Remove Access = Internal

[mplanzer]

Why do you need this change?

AFAIK, in BC there would be 2 options to create a QR Code without using a Web Service in between:

1. "Abuse" the "Swiss QR Code Helper" and replace the logo in the center
2. We are able to access the "Dynamics 2D QR-Code Encoder" codeunit from the System Application

I much prefer the second option. Could you please make this accessible?

Describe the request

diff --git a/src/Barcode/src/Dynamics%2520Barcode%2520Provider/Encoders/Dynamics2DQRCodeEncoder.Codeunit.al b/src/Barcode/src/Dynamics%2520Barcode%2520Provider/Encoders/Dynamics2DQRCodeEncoder.Codeunit.al
index a99e809..1d8834d 100644
--- a/src/Barcode/src/Dynamics%2520Barcode%2520Provider/Encoders/Dynamics2DQRCodeEncoder.Codeunit.al
+++ b/src/Barcode/src/Dynamics%2520Barcode%2520Provider/Encoders/Dynamics2DQRCodeEncoder.Codeunit.al
@@ -10,7 +10,6 @@ using System.Utilities;
 
 codeunit 9224 "Dynamics 2D QR-Code Encoder" implements "Barcode Image Encoder 2D"
 {
-    Access = Internal;
     InherentEntitlements = X;
     InherentPermissions = X;
 

Internal work item: AB#636016

[AleksandricMarko]

✅ Analysis complete - approved for implementation

---

Implementation:

Remove Access = Internal; from codeunit 9224 "Dynamics 2D QR-Code Encoder" to make it accessible to extensions.

Current code:

codeunit 9224 "Dynamics 2D QR-Code Encoder" implements "Barcode Image Encoder 2D"
{
    Access = Internal;
    InherentEntitlements = X;
    InherentPermissions = X;

Proposed change:

codeunit 9224 "Dynamics 2D QR-Code Encoder" implements "Barcode Image Encoder 2D"
{
    InherentEntitlements = X;
    InherentPermissions = X;

---

File: Dynamics2DQRCodeEncoder.Codeunit.al

[github-actions]

This issue has been approved for contribution ✅ Thanks for contributing.

[AleksandricMarko]

Thanks for reporting this. We agree, and we’ll publish a fix asap, either in an update for the current version or in the next major release. Please do not reply to this, as we do not monitor closed issues. If you have follow-up questions or requests, please create a new issue where you reference this one.